Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
Steve
After watching only the 1st half:
Though we are below the Eagles and Saints, we are on the same 'level' of the VIkings (though maybe a tiny notch lower), and likely equal to or above the Falcons, Panthers, Seattle, Steelers, and Lions. Regarding the Vikings game: Playing with your 1st and 5th-6th corners will always cause a loss against 2 (near) pro bowl level WRs. I would give Goff a A-/B+ for the first half....(not a coaches film grade).
We may lack some toughness, and guile, but greatness is in the foreseeable future-- the Rams have a lot of room for growth coming from QB, WRs and TEs position in the next 1-2 years. Yes, we need 1-2 edge rushers, and better corner play, but we are doing pretty well without all of that--so, when those are secured we can be a top 4-5 team every year in the NFC.
We may be below the Eagles, Saints, Chiefs and Patriots---but being a top 7-10 team in the NFL is pretty good in the first year with new coaches/schemes.
Oh, and by the way, Case Keenum probably takes the Jags to the super bowl next year...ya,baby, said it, don't hate it,LOL
Chiefs???
They just lost 4 in a row.....capped off by last weeks loss to the Giants in a baseball score.
Chargers just might be the hottest and best team in the AFC West right now.
Wish the Rams had Keenan Allen and some of those defensive backs the Chargers have. They are loaded in the secondary.
Grits
