November 23, 2017 08:32AM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 21,149 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
Steve
After watching only the 1st half:
Though we are below the Eagles and Saints, we are on the same 'level' of the VIkings (though maybe a tiny notch lower), and likely equal to or above the Falcons, Panthers, Seattle, Steelers, and Lions. Regarding the Vikings game: Playing with your 1st and 5th-6th corners will always cause a loss against 2 (near) pro bowl level WRs. I would give Goff a A-/B+ for the first half....(not a coaches film grade).
We may lack some toughness, and guile, but greatness is in the foreseeable future-- the Rams have a lot of room for growth coming from QB, WRs and TEs position in the next 1-2 years. Yes, we need 1-2 edge rushers, and better corner play, but we are doing pretty well without all of that--so, when those are secured we can be a top 4-5 team every year in the NFC.
We may be below the Eagles, Saints, Chiefs and Patriots---but being a top 7-10 team in the NFL is pretty good in the first year with new coaches/schemes.
Oh, and by the way, Case Keenum probably takes the Jags to the super bowl next year...ya,baby, said it, don't hate it,LOL
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Saw 1st half only: Rams-Vikings observations + Caserama | Steve | 408 | November 23, 2017 06:11AM |
Re: Saw 1st half only: Rams-Vikings observations + Caserama | Rampage2K- | 147 | November 23, 2017 08:32AM |
Re: Saw 1st half only: Rams-Vikings observations + Caserama | GreatRamNTheSky | 116 | November 23, 2017 03:07PM |