Quote
zn
March 11, 2017 02:04PM
[
ramsrule.com]
By my definition the #1 WR has to be consistently productive enough to get you both 70 catches and 1000 yards. "#1" is not "elite"--you can have guys who come through as #1 WR types who are not elite, it happens all the time.
And it doesn't matter how they do it, where they line up, their style or body type or skill set. Just this--if you use the guy to best advantage and set him up to use his strengths, can he be a #1 WR? On Woods I say yes. He is capable of that. Can he be a Garcon, Edelman, Baldwin, or Tate? Not talking body type, talent set, or where he lines up, how he is used—just talking about a certain level of reliable production that you can count on consistently.
