October 06, 2017 05:46AM
The Rams have a low sack percentage and low hit rate...4 sacks and 19 qb hits.

But that's on a low number of attempts.

As my friend IR pointed out to me in a different discussion, the actual percentage of sacks/hits is fairly high. ESPN lists them at 31% if you count sacks, hits, and hurries. [twitter.com]. That ranks 6th worst in the league.

Since mixed in with that they have a low sack percentage, this means that one reason the sacks are low is Goff. He's getting rid of the ball, even though being hit and hurried at a fairly high rate (not disastrously high, just high). This contrasts sharply with last year, when Goff did not handle the blitz. This year so far the Rams are the most blitzed team in the league. [twitter.com]

Thus while Planet Whitworth is excelling at pass pro, the rest of the line is actually fairly average.

As I said a lot of the low sack percentage is Goff, and this contrasts sharply with last year, where he had nearly double the sack percentage of Keenum behind the same line.



....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams OL is TOP TIER

max995October 05, 2017 01:38AM

  Re: Rams OL is TOP TIER

Steve453October 05, 2017 02:10AM

  Skins OL is really good and it showed

max296October 05, 2017 02:40AM

  OL ratings always tough

LMU93374October 05, 2017 03:16AM

  A generic lesson

RFL297October 05, 2017 05:21AM

  Re: And they are improving too, but depth is a concern

merlin310October 05, 2017 10:14AM

  Possibly. But perhaps the depth has improved too

Ramadune262October 05, 2017 08:24PM

  Re: Ha! Nice. Nm

Speed_Kills359October 05, 2017 10:23AM

  Caution with the OL

zn287October 06, 2017 05:46AM

  Re: Caution with the OL

LMU93207October 06, 2017 06:14AM

  +1 ... well put ... (NM)

zn258October 06, 2017 06:26AM

  scheme has a lot to do with it

ferragamo79256October 06, 2017 07:34AM

  Blitz

CeeZar239October 06, 2017 07:27AM

  Re: Caution with the OL

Steve324October 06, 2017 08:37AM