Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I think Les adjusts himself to what the staff wants

September 22, 2017 03:30PM
merlin, agree and sorta disagree.

IMHO, the dysfunction with Snisher wasn't that they "weren't on the same page". On the contrary-- I think Snead and Fisher WERE on the same page. they were just on the WRONG page, together. And a I blame Fisher for that, not Snead. Fisher had a vision for the team, and Snead was trying to draft to fulfill Fisher's vision.

For example, regarding Tavon: I think that Fisher was pumped to draft Tavon. In Fisher's mind, Tavon was the "home run hitter" that would be the complement to his ground and pound style of offense. In Fisher's mind, Tavon could be the lighting to complement the thunder of a power back. Fisher also hoped Tavon would be the deep threat WR that could burn defenses that were overcommitted to stopping the run. (Didn't work out like that of course, but that was the plan).

My point is-- Snead's successes and failures were always consistent with trying to find players that would fulfill the vision of the head coach. IMHO, Snead is a reasonably good judge of talent (more hits than misses) and TERRIFIC at negotiating trades.

IMHO, Snead is an above-average GM who works hard to fulfill his HC's vision. But Fisher's vision was outdated, and McVay's is cutting edge.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Les Snead I was wrong, I would have fired you when Fisher got fired.

Los Angeles Lenny632September 22, 2017 08:20AM

  it does appear that Snead McVay is a winning combo

max319September 22, 2017 08:22AM

  Hopefully for a very long time

Los Angeles Lenny372September 22, 2017 08:26AM

  Re: Les Snead I was wrong, I would have fired you when Fisher got fired.

Rams43309September 22, 2017 08:28AM

  Re: I think Les adjusts himself to what the staff wants

merlin281September 22, 2017 03:09PM

  Re: I think Les adjusts himself to what the staff wants

XXXIVwin291September 22, 2017 03:30PM

  It was definitely a collaborative effort

PaulButcher59233September 22, 2017 03:17PM

  Re: no you were not...

spagsbacker333September 22, 2017 05:53PM

  Re: no you were not...

Rampage2K-274September 22, 2017 06:20PM

  Re: no you were not...

XXXIVwin218September 22, 2017 06:26PM

  Re: no you were not...

Classicalwit178September 22, 2017 09:53PM