Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

completely disagree

September 17, 2017 05:24PM
Quote
9er8er
That's why they mortgaged the farm to get him, after all, isn't it?

We should also be guard against keeping expectations too low for a QB that was the first overall pick and costs a bunch of additional premium picks to boot. He's supposed to be capable of more and sooner than your typical prospect.

It really highlights the problem with investing so much in a project like Goff at the most difficult position to play in sports. By the time he's ready to put the team on his shoulders and win games, he's about to be a free agent or already is on some other team's roster. You risk getting all his "learning" years and somebody else getting all the benefit of it.

I just don't see Goff as a "first pick level qb."

I see him more as this: if you pick lower in the draft and want a franchise qb, the only way you get the one you want in the first round is to trade up for him.

It's that time in the NFL---qbs are such a premium that that's what you have to do.

What I expect of Goff is that he will slowly and visibly emerge as a viable franchise qb in spite of starting out as an especially green prospect from as Air Raid variant system---a system that has never before produced a viable continuing NFL starter.

So he was greener than most and yet IMO worth the price because his raw talents are appreciable.

He is not a Luck or Newton and the "he was picked first" label is kind of misplaced.

It's more like, if you want a guy and you don't have a high 1st round pick, the way the qb draft market works, you better trade up.

Same thing happened in the draft this year. You have to overpay. Doesn't mean that measured in the abstract the guy is a top 5 or top 10 pick.


....

....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2017 05:27PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Well that was a disappointing ending

Speed_Kills772September 17, 2017 02:46PM

  where the hell was Watkins

Hazlet Hacksaw387September 17, 2017 02:47PM

  Re: yup i thought there were a few weird calls for sure nm

Speed_Kills382September 17, 2017 02:49PM

  This can't continue IMO

Ram49357September 17, 2017 02:52PM

  Re: This can't continue IMO

CarolinaRam521September 17, 2017 03:10PM

  I think they stayed away from Norman

ferragamo79363September 17, 2017 02:53PM

  Thus echoing Bills fans

9er8er324September 17, 2017 02:58PM

  Re: can Goff throw an out?

Speed_Kills298September 17, 2017 03:06PM

  He has the arm for it, I think

9er8er251September 17, 2017 03:49PM

  Iam betting it was more Goff than McVay

Los Angeles Lenny238September 17, 2017 04:27PM

  Not happy... but liked the game...

JamesJM388September 17, 2017 02:54PM

  Re: Yeah i disagree

Speed_Kills310September 17, 2017 03:03PM

  agree with your disagreement

Hazlet Hacksaw289September 17, 2017 03:07PM

  yes, I did not expect this....

GlacieRam327September 17, 2017 03:10PM

  I didn't see the last Int, yet that is...

JamesJM315September 17, 2017 03:12PM

  he really locked on to Kupp

21Dog285September 17, 2017 03:14PM

  Yep..

sacram268September 17, 2017 03:50PM

  I think people were expecting too much

9er8er300September 17, 2017 04:16PM

  Yup. As Gurley said "last year the score would have been 27-3"

max424September 17, 2017 04:20PM

  baby steps

21Dog235September 17, 2017 04:26PM

  Exactly

Drew2839282September 17, 2017 05:35PM

  Did you expect Goff to win the game?

max295September 17, 2017 04:17PM

  For me...

JamesJM462September 17, 2017 04:27PM

  Re: i expected him to give them a chance

Speed_Kills304September 17, 2017 04:28PM

  That's fair

9er8er241September 17, 2017 05:05PM

  completely disagree

zn271September 17, 2017 05:24PM

  Problem is, it's just not true

9er8er291September 17, 2017 06:17PM

  And to that end

Drew2839376September 17, 2017 05:37PM

  ran much better, but..........

21Dog246September 17, 2017 05:41PM

  Re: Hey Drew... good to see you posting youngin'. Lol

Speed_Kills288September 17, 2017 05:46PM