August 25, 2017 01:00PM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 15,672 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
zn
Quote
RockRam
So the Rams give a $3m contract to an always hurt RB from Dallas.
He never practices with the team, at all, because......he's too injured to practice.
Now as we're a couple of weeks before we start the season, we hear that they have NO idea when he'll be able to play.
What the heck is going on here?
This sounds like the Rams got completely fleeced by the player. And besides, the NFL landscape is littered with vet RBs. Why in the world would the Rams pick up a never-healthy smurf of a RB, pay him decent money, and have NO idea when they signed him that he has a knee that must be chronically damaged?
But even more, why are they hanging on to him? What's the point? Clearly they threw $3mil in cap money down the toilet. Move on. They have enough RBs to get the job done. Dunbar isn't going to elevate our RB position that I can see.
They cleared him. He passed the physical. Can;t fleece that. And he got re-injured.
It was a risk, they gambled, they lost.
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Somebody explain the Dunbar thing to me. It seems bizarre | RockRam | 658 | August 25, 2017 11:55AM |
One of the head scratchers for me | Atlantic Ram | 214 | August 25, 2017 12:24PM |
Re: Somebody explain the Dunbar thing to me. It seems bizarre | zn | 273 | August 25, 2017 12:51PM |
Re: Re-injured when/where? | laram | 208 | August 25, 2017 01:00PM |
Re: Re-injured when/where? | zn | 162 | August 25, 2017 02:07PM |
No. Not the same thing with Easley and Dunbar. | RockRam | 159 | August 25, 2017 03:28PM |
Re: I think that one is on McVay Rock...NM | laram | 114 | August 25, 2017 03:33PM |
Re: No. Not the same thing with Easley and Dunbar. | zn | 158 | August 25, 2017 04:17PM |