Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Re-injured when/where?

August 25, 2017 01:00PM
Quote
zn
Quote
RockRam
So the Rams give a $3m contract to an always hurt RB from Dallas.
He never practices with the team, at all, because......he's too injured to practice.

Now as we're a couple of weeks before we start the season, we hear that they have NO idea when he'll be able to play.

What the heck is going on here?
This sounds like the Rams got completely fleeced by the player. And besides, the NFL landscape is littered with vet RBs. Why in the world would the Rams pick up a never-healthy smurf of a RB, pay him decent money, and have NO idea when they signed him that he has a knee that must be chronically damaged?

But even more, why are they hanging on to him? What's the point? Clearly they threw $3mil in cap money down the toilet. Move on. They have enough RBs to get the job done. Dunbar isn't going to elevate our RB position that I can see.

They cleared him. He passed the physical. Can;t fleece that. And he got re-injured.

It was a risk, they gambled, they lost.

He hasn't stepped on the field once for the Rams that I recall.

He passed the physical like Wells passed the physical.

Rams doctors? confused smiley



Best,
Laram
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Somebody explain the Dunbar thing to me. It seems bizarre

RockRam657August 25, 2017 11:55AM

  One of the head scratchers for me

Atlantic Ram212August 25, 2017 12:24PM

  Re: Somebody explain the Dunbar thing to me. It seems bizarre

zn271August 25, 2017 12:51PM

  Re: Re-injured when/where?

laram207August 25, 2017 01:00PM

  Re: Re-injured when/where?

zn161August 25, 2017 02:07PM

  No. Not the same thing with Easley and Dunbar.

RockRam157August 25, 2017 03:28PM

  Re: I think that one is on McVay Rock...NM

laram112August 25, 2017 03:33PM

  Re: No. Not the same thing with Easley and Dunbar.

zn157August 25, 2017 04:17PM