Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Was cost of relocating to L.A. worth it for Rams and Chargers?

July 12, 2017 06:18PM
Was cost of relocating to L.A. worth it for Rams and Chargers? Check out the latest franchise valuations

By VINCENT BONSIGNORE

Neither Rams owner Stan Kroenke nor Chargers owner Dean Spanos raised an eyebrow when fellow NFL owners informed them they’d have to fork over $550 million up front — or more if they opted to pay over 10 years — for the right to move to their teams to the second-biggest market in the country.

Kroenke and Spanos didn’t blink because they knew the financial power of playing in Los Angeles was far stronger than the hefty relocation fee they’d have to pay.

On Wednesday we found out just how powerful it is to call Los Angeles home.

The Rams left St. Louis for L.A. a little more than a year ago, but over those 12 months the value of the franchise has doubled based on Forbes’ annual rankings of the world’s most valuable sports franchises.

After falling outside the top 50 in the rankings last year with a valuation of $1.4 billion, the Rams soared all the way to No. 12 on the 2017 list at $2.9 billion.

Read Complete Article
[www.ocregister.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Relocation cost for the Rams Chargers and Raiders

Ljsrams1962770July 12, 2017 11:46AM

  $650mm for relocation and the Chargers 'had' to move?

promomasterj309July 12, 2017 01:28PM

  And it goes up $100 MIL...

RFIP290July 12, 2017 02:48PM

  Re: And it goes up $100 MIL...

Ohiorams282July 12, 2017 04:39PM

  Was cost of relocating to L.A. worth it for Rams and Chargers?

RamBill267July 12, 2017 06:18PM