Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: he won't be paid like a top DT

June 20, 2017 04:36PM
Quote
zn
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
zn
Quote
RFIP
Quote
BlackSheep
What if he wants to take up the entire salary cap? You would give it to him because that's what he wants, right? eye rolling smiley

This is not hard, take the top DT $$ now and add 10% w/60-70% G-jack.

He's being paid as one of the 4-5 top DEFENDERS.

Not DTs.

That means his reference pool includes guys like Von Miller.

....

Regardless how his agent wants to market him, he still has to weigh the fact that the Rams could get away with paying him around $40 million over the next four years with very little guarantee money.

Obviously the Rams and especially Donald don't want to to go that route, but worst case scenario it could.

If he wants his money two years before his rookie contract expires and then a possible three years of franchise tags at DT money he is going to have to be reasonable with his demands.

If his agent doesn't realize that, he needs to find a new one.

It's what the Rams realize. They realize they fully and openly and publicly assented to an extension. They've already said in public that he has earned and will get a big contract. They also understand that with a player of Donald's caliber, playing hardball would be counterproductive. If he wanted to, he could just say fine trade me. Plus of course playing hardball would just backfire in terms of team morale.

What you list there are not real options. They're merely on paper options the Rams have obviously already discarded. The Rams are acting like they fully realize that they can't do hardball on this one. This isn't Zygmunt trying to squeeze Warner. It's all very different from that.


...

....


Yes, those ARE real options, if Donald is demanding to be paid a kings ransom.....Obviously they aren't willing to just bend over and give him what ever his agent thinks he's worth or a deal would have been done by now.... They're negotiating a deal, not backing up the Brinks truck.... And due to the CBA, the Rams have the upper hand, obviously Donald could hold out if doesn't want to get paid and incur fines.

Like I said, both parties don't want it to get to that and it probably won't.....a couple factors are working against Donald right now, one he's not a UFA and two, he's a DT.... He's not a 18-20 sack DE or a shutdown corner. Don't get me wrong, I want him in horns and happy, but I don't want his contract holding this team hostage for years either.



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  PLEASE PAY DONALD WHATEVER HE WANTS!

ramsfanatic1041June 20, 2017 04:55AM

  Re: PLEASE PAY DONALD WHATEVER HE WANTS!

Rams43485June 20, 2017 05:15AM

  Re: PLEASE PAY DONALD WHATEVER HE WANTS!

ramsfanatic349June 20, 2017 05:21AM

  Re: PLEASE PAY DONALD WHATEVER HE WANTS!

Rams43424June 20, 2017 05:35AM

  Re: Yup that's it

BlackSheep440June 20, 2017 05:22AM

  Offer the going rate imo

RFIP351June 20, 2017 05:27AM

  Re: Offer the going rate imo

Rams43381June 20, 2017 05:46AM

  he won't be paid like a top DT

zn515June 20, 2017 06:34AM

  Re: he won't be paid like a top DT

Rampage2K-448June 20, 2017 08:53AM

  Re: he won't be paid like a top DT

zn330June 20, 2017 04:16PM

  Re: he won't be paid like a top DT

Rampage2K-360June 20, 2017 04:36PM

  Pretty obvious, but I'll type it out for you anyway R2K

ArizonaRamFan302June 21, 2017 06:37AM

  Re: Pretty obvious, but I'll type it out for you anyway R2K

Rams43387June 21, 2017 06:47AM

  it's irrelevant

zn368June 22, 2017 06:17AM

  Re: it's irrelevant

Rams43442June 22, 2017 06:48AM

  wow

ramsfanatic476June 20, 2017 09:17AM

  Lol!

Ramadune337June 20, 2017 09:42AM

  Re: wow

RounderRick324June 20, 2017 04:26PM

  It's pretty extreme, but fair point

ArizonaRamFan394June 21, 2017 11:48AM

  Re: IMO

Speed_Kills427June 20, 2017 09:25AM

  I'm not there yet

Ramadune341June 20, 2017 09:54AM

  $60M+ guaranteed is the number

LMU93338June 20, 2017 10:05AM

  Re: wow you make that sounds so easy

Speed_Kills325June 20, 2017 10:30AM

  Re: wow you make that sounds so easy

zn340June 20, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: wow you make that sounds so easy

LMU93318June 20, 2017 12:37PM

  Re: yes to all of that nm

Speed_Kills287June 20, 2017 02:42PM

  you'd have to be super discreet about it, but...

Suh-weet!316June 20, 2017 01:13PM

  Re: you'd have to be super discreet about it, but...

zn483June 20, 2017 04:23PM

  The GM that exposed them in that instance....

Suh-weet!348June 20, 2017 05:26PM

  Re: The GM that exposed them in that instance....

zn365June 20, 2017 05:30PM

  Re: Not really...

dzrams305June 21, 2017 02:45PM

  Re: Not really...

zn296June 21, 2017 03:00PM

  Re: IMO

RamsFanSinceLA411June 20, 2017 01:13PM

  Re: Nothing concrete

Speed_Kills321June 20, 2017 02:44PM

  We've seen how draft picks can be wasted and squandered.

Saguaro356June 20, 2017 01:50PM

  Re: You're probably right

Speed_Kills363June 20, 2017 02:49PM

  Ok, yep, I see that in your second post.

Saguaro312June 20, 2017 06:12PM

  He wants to get paid not out

LesBaker325June 20, 2017 02:54PM

  Dickerson? London Fletcher? Why not mention Ollie Matson?

RockRam326June 20, 2017 11:09AM

  Ollie Matson - I'd Wager that is the only mention of Ollie Matson on this board

stlramz304June 20, 2017 08:44PM

  You reminded me...

JamesJM309June 20, 2017 09:13PM

  What it gets me is Medicare. Like Phillips. (nm)

RockRam291June 21, 2017 05:42AM

  Would ADonald garner 2 1st round picks in a trade?

SunTzu_vs_Camus322June 22, 2017 05:18AM

  no

zn329June 22, 2017 05:26AM

  Re: no

Rams43413June 22, 2017 06:16AM

  Re: no

dzrams322June 22, 2017 09:09AM

  Re: no

Rams43355June 22, 2017 09:40AM

  Re: no

dzrams402June 22, 2017 11:53AM

  Re: no

Rams43309June 22, 2017 12:11PM

  Re: no

dzrams455June 22, 2017 12:40PM

  Re: no

Rams43332June 22, 2017 03:41PM

  Re: no

dzrams304June 22, 2017 06:42PM

  Re: no

Rams43530June 22, 2017 08:42PM

  Heptathlons are interesting because the winner...

SunTzu_vs_Camus364June 23, 2017 05:22AM

  Re: Heptathlons are interesting because the winner...

dzrams445June 23, 2017 07:31AM

  Re: no

zn351June 22, 2017 09:42AM

  Who was that LB traded for 11 ?

RAMSINCE ARNETT325June 22, 2017 08:42AM

  Les Ritcher nm

21Dog297June 22, 2017 01:14PM

  Here's another way to determine AD's value...

Rams43353June 22, 2017 06:40AM