April 29, 2017 12:02PM
Quote
RFIP
...it's the PLAYER that baffles most. And when Gil said he was the first player OUTSIDE HIS TOP 100 well that shook me a little because Gil is money when it comes to the draft. No one is perfect but he's very good, especially with his top 100.

Quote
Rams43
The clues were there all along when we look back.

McVay loves a TE oriented O.

He clearly has had success in developing and scheming TE's in effective passing O's.

Kendricks was cut shortly after McVay's hire. Obviously, McVay wanted a different type of TE and recognized that Kendricks was not gonna be a good fit.

So, it was beyond certain that a TE was gonna be a high pick. Only question was which TE and how high once Njoku was grabbed.

Look, Lamp is a fine player. He might well see multiple Pro Bowls as a OG or C. But Everett is considered a freak and plays a position highly prized by McVay. One that moves the chains, flips the field, and scores TD's. Interior OL players,, important as they are, don't do those things. Competent interior OL players are easier to find than TE playmakers.

Looking back, I think it's easier to follow McVay's thinking.

I trust McVay on this, and all other O matters. At least until or unless he shows that he doesn't deserve it, that is.

Get back to me in 3 years, RFIP. Not 24 hours.

Then we can determine whether McVay or Brandt was more correct.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  McVay: Rams' 2nd- and 3rd-round picks 'exactly what we wanted'

RamBill1188April 29, 2017 09:19AM

  "The Rams identified Everett as a potential target two years ago."

9er8er432April 29, 2017 10:29AM

  Yep. Pretty scary.

max425April 29, 2017 10:35AM

  Re: Yep. Pretty scary.

six2stack328April 29, 2017 10:40AM

  Re: Yeah it's highly unusual.

laram359April 29, 2017 10:42AM

  I agree

RFIP328April 29, 2017 10:49AM

  I think you look no further than

stlramz238April 29, 2017 07:20PM

  Re: Yep. Pretty scary.

RamBill537April 29, 2017 10:56AM

  How about this...

max279April 29, 2017 11:03AM

  How dare you

RamUK277April 29, 2017 11:04AM

  Re: How about this...

Rams43288April 29, 2017 11:15AM

  It's an heuristic

RamUK280April 29, 2017 11:22AM

  Re: How about this...

max292April 29, 2017 11:28AM

  Re: How about this...

Rams43401April 29, 2017 11:42AM

  Simple...

max249April 29, 2017 11:47AM

  Re: Simple...

Rams43418April 29, 2017 11:54AM

  We are going nowhere with this. Agree to disagree. nm

max249April 29, 2017 12:09PM

  Re: Simple...

dzrams306April 29, 2017 12:18PM

  Re: Simple...

zn249April 29, 2017 12:59PM

  Re: Fully agree... nm

dzrams258April 29, 2017 01:03PM

  False equivalency

RamUK394April 29, 2017 01:49PM

  Depends on what you hope to be convinced of

9er8er397April 29, 2017 11:07AM

  I agree Max

droopy298April 29, 2017 10:58AM

  Re: I agree Max

six2stack266April 29, 2017 11:01AM

  and this is the crux of the problem

PHDram284April 29, 2017 11:26AM

  I don't think you understand the concept of probability

9er8er270April 29, 2017 11:38AM

  Re: I don't think you understand the concept of probability

Rams43265April 29, 2017 11:44AM

  I don't know what you do and don't detect

9er8er240April 29, 2017 11:48AM

  Re: I don't think you understand the concept of probability

dzrams258April 29, 2017 11:50AM

  Are you saying you don't think anybody can?

9er8er282April 29, 2017 12:03PM

  Re: You missed the premise...

dzrams247April 29, 2017 12:33PM

  Oh!

9er8er298April 29, 2017 12:44PM

  Re: Disappointing!

dzrams206April 29, 2017 01:01PM

  It is

9er8er247April 29, 2017 01:18PM

  Re: It is

dzrams246April 29, 2017 01:49PM

  then a team should never ever trade down.

PHDram277April 29, 2017 12:16PM

  Why's that?

9er8er263April 29, 2017 12:18PM

  Re: Why's that?

PHDram221April 29, 2017 01:01PM

  Re: Why's that?

9er8er439April 29, 2017 01:36PM

  I disagree with the premise that

PHDram248April 29, 2017 01:44PM

  Disagree all you want

9er8er235April 29, 2017 01:47PM

  I didnt. Thanx

PHDram218April 29, 2017 02:04PM

  Re: Why's that?

dzrams253April 29, 2017 01:53PM

  No

9er8er197April 29, 2017 02:07PM

  Re: No...

dzrams258April 29, 2017 02:20PM

  Nope, false

9er8er208April 29, 2017 02:35PM

  Re: How about we agree to disagree?

dzrams219April 29, 2017 02:45PM

  For those puzzled by the Everett pick...

Rams43587April 29, 2017 11:12AM

  Few question the PICK

RFIP389April 29, 2017 11:51AM

  Re: Few question the PICK

Rams43304April 29, 2017 12:02PM

  If it takes 3 years we will have our answer after 1...nm

RFIP250April 29, 2017 04:06PM

  I'm curious why some here ignore some of the Everett scouting reports

RockRam342April 29, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: I'm curious why some here ignore some of the Everett scouting reports

PARAM303April 29, 2017 02:19PM

  Re: For those puzzled by the Everett pick...

Classicalwit266April 29, 2017 03:50PM

  Re: For those puzzled by the Everett pick...

Rams43256April 29, 2017 04:36PM

  31 other teams say the same thing...

jemach283April 29, 2017 01:59PM