The point is that you can't pick a D player and an O player at the same time. So, assuming two co-equal players are available, one D, one O, which do you take? My view is to take the O player because we have real weaknesses there.
Your view seems to be to take the D player to either strengthen a strength or at least to keep it strong.
And I think this is the question the Rams have probably already debated among themselves and resolved it.
We'll (probably) find out the answer late next week.
