| April 03, 2017 03:52AM |
Quote
Flipper336
Quote
RamJr
Quote
Flipper336
Quote
den-the-coach
Quote
Flipper336
This conversation is over if you don't want to be serious...or even somewhere close to reality.
Nope I blew it, I have not seen the other touchdowns, but I went by what a few publications wrote instead of actually watching the game. I get on others for doing that because I am always posting "Did you actually watch the game?" Kupp still had a great game, however, owning Peters was not correct and I thank you sir for taking a wrong and making it right.
Kupp did still have a great game, and it's one of the many reasons I am a fan of his. I just feel he's getting pushed up a tick er because he's the gritty/overachiever type that we all root for. He WILL succeed in the NFL, I feel he's one of the safest prospects in the entire draft but when PFF falsely says he dominated top tier prospects it gives a fairly tale impression of what Kupp's game/upside is.
Side note- This is a great example of why PFF should be taken with a huge grain of salt. They have clear favorites and negative targets...it shows often when you really compare what they grade with what you see. A basic positive play from a guy they like gets a +2 but the same play from a guy they have already determined is a bad player probably gets a push (0) or at best a +1. Over the course of a game that can really change an overall grade.
I'm not really sure that makes any sense. You think someone likes a player better and then they get a better score for basic plays where someone else would get a lower score because they are trying to push a narrative? That compromises the whole premise of their product and if you could see the work and integrity behind the scenes, you'd realize how foolish that is. I just want to tell you that grat plays still don't get +2, they aren't handed out easily. I can understand your taking things with a grain of salt.
They say he dominated Marcus Peters. Two people have repeated it because of what they said/graded...it's simply not true. I have the videos showing it's not true. So if they exaggerate his play over an entire game, I'm not making a large leap to suggest they do similar exaggerations on individual plays.
You same I'm foolish, but I provided proof...I'd say blindly following PFF is the foolish route <shrug>
Well if you're going to ask if someone watched the film, then at least read the article. They said he dominated Washington's defense, not Peters specifically. Two of his three touchdowns were in Peters' coverage, period.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/03/2017 11:20AM by 73Ram.
