Quote
zn

Quote
dzrams
I stated that because the averages are taken over a number of years. That means it's likely that some of those years had very deep drafts too. T

This one is unusually deep. That's what people from all over the spectrum are saying.

.

I've heard that too.

But that unusual deepness applies to the earlier rounds too. IOW, the ratio of finding a starter in the 2nd vs. the 4th would remain unchanged. Right?

If we want to ensure a quality starter, it's much greater odds doing it earlier in a deep or shallow draft. And 4th round odds are still low. Of course the last point is debatable depending on exactly how deep the draft is. I'll grant that.