Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I'm a bit surprised by the Groy disappointment by some...

March 18, 2017 07:58AM
Look, I wanted him, too. At the tendered price and with no other compensation.

But let's don't overreact at losing him. Possibly only temporarily, btw.

He's a C, not a franchise starting QB, after all. Probably a middle of the pack talent, at that. Unless Kromer could work some magic, somehow.

I'm trying to put this in perspective, here.

Our '17 season doesn't hinge on whether we get Groy. It does hinge, in part, upon getting an upgrade at C. Groy was merely their first attempt at upgrading the C position, but it certainly won't be their last.

To be realistic, today is only Mar 18th. We've got almost 6 full months to come up with a good C. We've got an outstanding OL coach and a new HC that seems to fully grasp the importance of a strong OL, including C. There is every reason to expect that they will address this hole.

Draft
Trade
Cross train (don't laugh, Kromer has done amazing things in OL player development)
FA

One of these will provide our '17 starting C.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Centers.

CROMWELL211482March 17, 2017 09:28AM

  Other than Mangold, not going to solve this in FA.

RockRam536March 17, 2017 09:52AM

  draft one

LMU93376March 17, 2017 10:06AM

  Re: Other than Mangold, not going to solve this in FA.

bigjimram21463March 17, 2017 12:07PM

  Without Groy, this is a mess.

alyoshamucci573March 17, 2017 12:14PM

  Groy is an unknown

TonyHunter87366March 17, 2017 12:39PM

  I don't see it that way......

roman18344March 17, 2017 01:58PM

  Re: I don't see it that way......

TonyHunter87334March 17, 2017 01:59PM

  Re: I don't see it that way......

roman18330March 17, 2017 02:19PM

  Re: Groy is an unknown

Classicalwit354March 18, 2017 03:21AM

  Re: Without Groy, this is a mess.

Rams43542March 17, 2017 02:22PM

  Without Groy, this is a mess. I agree 100%

Anonymous User536March 17, 2017 04:44PM

  I'm a bit surprised by the Groy disappointment by some...

Rams43411March 18, 2017 07:58AM

  I agree..It was a disppointment not landing Groy...

PaulButcher59502March 17, 2017 07:13PM

  Re: I agree..It was a disppointment not landing Groy...

hubestar557March 18, 2017 12:10AM

  Re: I agree..It was a disppointment not landing Groy...

stlramz323March 18, 2017 12:36AM

  +1...or ......

Arkansas Ram351March 18, 2017 06:32PM

  Re: center

leafnose353March 18, 2017 06:35AM

  Re: center

den-the-coach518March 19, 2017 04:11AM

  Re: nice, coach !

leafnose298March 19, 2017 04:56AM

  Re: Sullivan & Elflein

den-the-coach301March 19, 2017 05:57AM

  Sullivan seems like a natural fit at this point.

PHDram290March 19, 2017 07:31AM

  Are back injuries a concern with Sullivan?

Rams43285March 19, 2017 08:14AM

  Re: If he is better than Barnes........Than yes, I go Sullivan.

oldschoolramfan262March 19, 2017 08:27AM

  not sure why Barnes couldn't have been kept around.....

21Dog277March 19, 2017 08:31AM

  Re: If he is better than Barnes........Than yes, I go Sullivan.

Rams43269March 19, 2017 08:59AM

  What are the choices?

PHDram510March 19, 2017 08:42AM

  Re: What are the choices?

TonyHunter87408March 19, 2017 08:46AM

  Re: What are the choices?

PHDram267March 19, 2017 08:52AM

  Re: What are the choices?

TonyHunter87319March 19, 2017 09:06AM

  Re: I agree..It was a disppointment not landing Groy...

Classicalwit316March 19, 2017 03:08PM

  Draft Dan Feeney

9er8er302March 19, 2017 12:35PM

  In McVay O, the QB calls the protection calls

Rampage519March 19, 2017 01:46PM

  Re: In McVay O, the QB calls the protection calls

den-the-coach440March 19, 2017 03:13PM