Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Either way is fine

February 07, 2017 01:01PM
They are both icons. Lombardi owned the 1960s. Belichick has owned the 2000s.

I will give you this, though ... as much as I respect Bill Walsh and what he did to change the game in the 1980s ... what Belichick has done in New England is clearly superior to what occurred in San Fran in those days.

The 49ers got fat in the NFL's wild, wild west era when any team could spend as much as it wanted ... and everybody knew that Easy Ed was doing some serious book-cooking to make sure the San Francisco rosters were loaded, year in and year out.

Not so during Billy Burger's time in New England.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Patriots Dynasty: The Benefits of Coaching Blunders

Ram49872February 06, 2017 05:55PM

  Re: Patriots Dynasty: The Benefits of Coaching Blunders

JoeMad398February 06, 2017 06:36PM

  That is the entire key

Ram49413February 06, 2017 08:03PM

  Re: That is the entire key

LMU93313February 07, 2017 02:57AM

  Bend but don't break coaching

Flipper336353February 07, 2017 03:00AM

  I can understand an argument for Belichick

The_Bad_Guy368February 07, 2017 05:38AM

  Free Agency/salary cap/player turnover is the tie breaker for me

Flipper336351February 07, 2017 06:16AM

  I get it and agree on several levels

The_Bad_Guy347February 07, 2017 11:45AM

  And I was too adamant

Flipper336345February 07, 2017 12:09PM

  Either way is fine

The_Bad_Guy275February 07, 2017 01:01PM

  Walsh had a huge advantage

LesBaker266February 07, 2017 01:41PM

  great book

21Dog274February 07, 2017 07:35AM

  Maraniss is great

The_Bad_Guy273February 07, 2017 11:50AM

  Matt Bryant 88/94 FGs....

LMU93410February 07, 2017 04:19AM

  A bit of a change of heart sort of

Atlantic Ram290February 07, 2017 08:37AM