January 13, 2017 07:48AM
Dickerson, Thurman Thomas and Curtis Martin all said the OL looked atrocious and wasn't opening lanes.

Gurley played a role, but I doubt anyone would be calling him out if he ran for Dallas.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

laram736January 13, 2017 06:48AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

stlrams13462January 13, 2017 06:51AM

  Analytics: My A$$

RamFanInPA432January 13, 2017 07:13AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

no name356January 13, 2017 07:18AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

dzrams317January 13, 2017 07:21AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

no name313January 13, 2017 07:27AM

  Re: That's correct...

laram333January 13, 2017 07:30AM

  Re: That's correct...

no name341January 13, 2017 07:51AM

  Re: That's correct...

laram308January 13, 2017 08:00AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

RamFanInPA359January 13, 2017 07:27AM

  36% of carries..

RFIP314January 13, 2017 07:35AM

  Re: That's it RFIP...

laram299January 13, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

dzrams300January 13, 2017 07:10AM

  I'm going to go with the HOF RBs

Ram49317January 13, 2017 07:48AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

BobCarl205January 13, 2017 06:05PM

  Right ... they both did poorly.

alyoshamucci295January 13, 2017 06:15PM