January 13, 2017 07:10AM
Yeah, this doesn’t surprise me. I don’t need analytics to see that Gurley was a big part of his lack of production.

Could you post the link of where you got this info though?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

laram738January 13, 2017 06:48AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

stlrams13462January 13, 2017 06:51AM

  Analytics: My A$$

RamFanInPA435January 13, 2017 07:13AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

no name356January 13, 2017 07:18AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

dzrams318January 13, 2017 07:21AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

no name314January 13, 2017 07:27AM

  Re: That's correct...

laram333January 13, 2017 07:30AM

  Re: That's correct...

no name341January 13, 2017 07:51AM

  Re: That's correct...

laram308January 13, 2017 08:00AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

RamFanInPA359January 13, 2017 07:27AM

  36% of carries..

RFIP315January 13, 2017 07:35AM

  Re: That's it RFIP...

laram299January 13, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

dzrams301January 13, 2017 07:10AM

  I'm going to go with the HOF RBs

Ram49319January 13, 2017 07:48AM

  Re: Analytics:Gurley received good run blocking on 36% of carries..

BobCarl205January 13, 2017 06:05PM

  Right ... they both did poorly.

alyoshamucci296January 13, 2017 06:15PM