January 12, 2017 11:21PM
Quote
dzrams
Quote
waterfield
when it comes to acquiring personnel. I am still of the believe that giving up a huge number of draft choices to acquire Goff was not something Fisher wanted to do. It's my opinion that was a decision that came from above. Nevertheless I believe he came around when it became obvious to him that this is what SK and Demoff wanted. I have no way of supporting this opinion but in my mind it makes the most sense. Maybe Fish will write a book on this someday. Maybe not.

Fair enough. Although I don't think we see this that much differently.

It's very plausible that the order to make a huge splash by trading for a franchise QB came from up top. Personally, I lay it more at the feet of Kroenke. But even if it did, I think that circumstance was unusual and the exception.

The general rule for personnel was that Fisher was the man.

I think you guys are relying on false hunches more than an eye for the reality. More so W. On taking Goff, Fisher figured he had his team and just needed the qb and that they were going to pay for that. The number of things people on message boards who said Fisher would never do XY or Z and he DID do those things? LIke drafting a lineman in the first round? Well he traded up for a qb. I think that was a team consensus.

The structure was very clear. Like a lot of teams, the Rams had a veteran head coach with final say on personnel and then a GM who in essence worked for that coach. That's how Seattle does it, that's how New England has done it since Bellichick's first day being hired, long before he became "Bellichick."

I keep trying to tell W this. It is simply not true that the only system out there is the one where you have a veteran GM who is over the coach. The idea that any variation from the "top GM" model is somehow wrong, or suspicious, or whatever, just doesn't fit the NFL. Both models are out there and both have worked.

Interestingly, now that the coach is the inexperienced one and the GM isn't (it was the other way around with Fisher), my bet is Snead becomes more of the Polian type "guy in charge" style GM on draft and free agent decisions. EXCEPT the roster. As a rule, coaches always have last say on cutting the roster down for the season.

...

...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/12/2017 11:55PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  GM Les Snead will retain his position with the club

IowaRam1170January 12, 2017 11:27AM

  Re: Yeah, this is expected...

dzrams344January 12, 2017 11:50AM

  Thanks for the scoops Iowa! You are like a regular....

guinnessram416January 12, 2017 11:50AM

  Proves Fisher was in control.

CROMWELL21463January 12, 2017 11:55AM

  Re: Proves Fisher was in control? That was never in question

zn311January 12, 2017 12:21PM

  Re: Proves Fisher was in control? That was never in question

stlramz390January 12, 2017 12:23PM

  Re: But Snead was contacted first...

laram368January 12, 2017 12:24PM

  I know it was you, Jeff.....you broke my heart

21Dog321January 12, 2017 02:27PM

  Re: I know it was you, Jeff.....you broke my heart

stlramz299January 12, 2017 07:46PM

  Re: GM Les Snead will retain his position with the club

Rams43331January 12, 2017 11:57AM

  yep, 43...a very underrated truth. imo

SunTzu_vs_Camus230January 12, 2017 02:51PM

  Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

PaulButcher59446January 12, 2017 12:10PM

  Re: Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

Rampage2K-375January 12, 2017 12:17PM

  Re: Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

PaulButcher59337January 12, 2017 12:25PM

  Re: Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

Rampage2K-324January 12, 2017 12:51PM

  Re: Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

bigjimram21324January 12, 2017 12:59PM

  Re: Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

BobCarl300January 12, 2017 04:30PM

  Re: Of course...This was Demoff's plan all along..

bigjimram21296January 12, 2017 05:41PM

  Re: Exactly...........

oldschoolramfan326January 12, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: Power Structure

dzrams419January 12, 2017 12:15PM

  Re: Power Structure

PaulButcher59312January 12, 2017 12:20PM

  Re: Power Structure

dzrams323January 12, 2017 12:39PM

  Re: Power Structure

PaulButcher59504January 12, 2017 12:42PM

  Re: Oh gosh...

laram406January 12, 2017 12:46PM

  You serious?

PaulButcher59335January 12, 2017 12:52PM

  Re: Yes I'm serious...

laram494January 12, 2017 12:59PM

  Re: You serious?

bigjimram21329January 12, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: Power Structure

dzrams334January 12, 2017 01:00PM

  Re: Power Structure

EastRam310January 12, 2017 02:24PM

  Re: Power Structure

bigjimram21210January 12, 2017 01:06PM

  Re: Power Structure

bigjimram21459January 12, 2017 01:05PM

  So your saying the Rams will look like...

TonyHunter87364January 12, 2017 01:24PM

  But will he really be the decision maker like most GMs ?

waterfield318January 12, 2017 05:21PM

  Re: But will he really be the decision maker like most GMs ?

dzrams321January 12, 2017 05:33PM

  We likely see things differently

waterfield436January 12, 2017 07:09PM

  Re: We likely see things differently

dzrams467January 12, 2017 07:51PM

  Re: We likely see things differently

zn296January 12, 2017 11:21PM