Re: 22nd game under Fisher with 10 or fewer points

Quote
zn

Naw you guys are being silly.
Not as silly as defending an undefensable coach.


You are saying they PICKED Clemens, Davis, and Hill to be frontline starters?
Is that what we said? Or is it YET ANOTHER of your classic ZN "straw man" arguments. Not hard to refute statements never made.

That;s you claim? Cause it's "I don't care I don't need logic" time?
Again, no one said that. Also, I can't believe you would use the word "logic" to refute criticism of Fisher.

Why were they starting then?

Did anyone predict Foles would fall apart to that extent? Some said he might not be that good but no one predicted THAT.

Was Keenum picked to be a starting caliber franchise qb?
No, but he was picked by Fisher to be a starting caliber QB for 10 games while a potential franchise QB rode the pines.

And yes Schott was a decent coordinator. I told all the people who underestimated him and called him "horrible," you don't KNOW bad in a coordinator. They got their wish I guess.
Yeah, you won that won. He wasn't "horrible". He aspired, in your own words, to be "decent".

If in the last 28 games they had scored 10 or less in 18.75% of their games, like with Schott, it would have been 5 times. As it is, it's 12.
[[i]i]If............... nuff said. And I can just see someone going in to interview as an OC touting that his O scored 10pts or less "only" 5 times in 28 games[/i].

Once again, reality rears its ugly head and proves just about everything you post to be inaccurate. No matter the context.[/i]

...