Re: CK is better at some things.... ehhhh....
| November 16, 2016 11:19AM |
Quote
JamesJM
And I know you're aware of the following zn, but for thread clarity...
Other than being more knowledgeable about what Fisher wants, and how and when he wants it implemented during games, I don't think CK will prove to be better than Goff at anything... and the 'more knowledgable' thing I believe will fade quickly as Goff's starts add up. Goes without saying we don't know about Goff yet... and that I'm basing that on the little I have seen of him and the wealth of what I've seen from CK.
I really do think that Goff's more physical ability, (making throws), will prove to be more than enough to compensate and overcome the strengths in CK's game which, as I stated, are basically 'knowledge' of the system IMHO... and this starting immediately, this next game. (that's no prediction of a rousing win). It's also going to take some time for the team to adapt to Goff and not just Goff adapting to the team. As 'new horizons' begin to manifest themselves, which I think, again, will be immediately apparent - the transition to a more competent offense will be sooner rather than later. - JamesJM
I actually don't know what you're responding to, old friend. It doesn't seem to be anything anyone said or thinks. It is true that CK has more experience reading defenses, seeing blitzes, calling audibles and protections. But then no one was arguing CK was the better qb. What I said was this---the veteran can do some things the rookie can't, Goff can do some things Keenum can't. No one argued that the offense would be better with Keenum or that it would stay the same with Goff. Somewhere else I just got through discussing with you how I think the offense would change with Goff.
....
