November 09, 2016 04:45AM
Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off


Alden Gonzalez
ESPN Staff Writer

THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. -- Los Angeles Rams receiver Tavon Austin went from 15 targets against the New York Giants to two targets against the Carolina Panthers.

It's been that kind of year.

Weeks before the start of the regular season, the Rams gave Austin a four-year, $42 million extension with the expectation that his production would only increase. But that has yet to be the case. Austin is on pace for 149 fewer yards from scrimmage in 2016. He finished the 2015 season with a career-high 907 yards, gaining 473 through the air and 434 on the ground. This year, Austin is on pace for 632 passing yards but only 126 rushing yards.

The Rams are using him far less on the ground and targeting him a lot more as a receiver, but the production hasn't necessarily been what they expected.

"That's how football is," Austin said. "You look at last year, I probably had eight or nine touchdowns already."

Actually, Austin had seven by the midway point of the 2015 season.

This year he has two.

"Teams are not crazy," Austin went on. "They definitely know what they're doing, and they have their guys that they try to take out of the game. They're not going to let you keep beating them with the same thing. That's how this league goes. You might have one good year, and next year, it might get a little harder for you. That's what it's about."

Read Complete Article [www.espn.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

RamBill880November 09, 2016 04:45AM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Tony Romas404November 09, 2016 04:53AM

  He Is Gone After The Season Ends

troublefree481November 09, 2016 06:14AM

  not at that price

Hazlet Hacksaw407November 09, 2016 06:34AM

  Austin's contract

LMU93537November 09, 2016 06:50AM

  they're not using him right this year

zn463November 09, 2016 06:53AM

  they need a new direction on offense

Hazlet Hacksaw344November 09, 2016 07:09AM

  I dont agree

zn398November 09, 2016 07:25AM

  So they are basically wasting a $42 million Asset now

Hazlet Hacksaw401November 09, 2016 07:33AM

  I don't look at it that way

zn363November 09, 2016 08:42AM

  I agree with that

Hazlet Hacksaw538November 09, 2016 08:50AM

  Re: So they are basically wasting a $42 million Asset now

Classicalwit396November 09, 2016 06:07PM

  I differ on that my friend

zn370November 10, 2016 04:53AM

  Re: I dont agree

BobCarl369November 09, 2016 03:46PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn364November 09, 2016 03:52PM

  Re: I dont agree

CraigMatson380November 09, 2016 05:15PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn285November 09, 2016 05:28PM

  Re: I dont agree

Classicalwit354November 09, 2016 06:12PM

  Re: I dont agree

CraigMatson368November 09, 2016 06:36PM

  Re: I dont agree

zn334November 09, 2016 08:09PM

  Well, I'm with you on your premise

Old Goat556November 10, 2016 02:21PM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Rams43572November 09, 2016 06:58AM

  Dexter McCluster 2.0

ferragamo79528November 09, 2016 07:39AM

  Re: Dexter McCluster 2.0

Ramit392November 11, 2016 06:33AM

  Re: Dexter McCluster 2.0

Ohiorams469November 12, 2016 02:38AM

  Re: Rams still waiting for Tavon Austin to pay off

Anonymous User525November 09, 2016 08:51AM

  TA= Definition of Bust nm

Ram49327November 09, 2016 09:05AM

  disagree

zn401November 09, 2016 09:18AM

  #8 pick. lost picks. minimal production

Ram49477November 09, 2016 09:39AM

  yeah we're just going to disagree

zn374November 09, 2016 10:05AM

  Re: yeah we're just going to disagree

LMU93554November 10, 2016 03:52AM

  I agree....that said comparing a player like

ferragamo79637November 10, 2016 03:03PM

  Re: I agree....that said comparing a player like

zn390November 10, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: disagree

poplarbluffman469November 09, 2016 09:47AM

  Yep. DAnthony Thomas, Ace Saunder, Dexter McCluster etc.NM

Ram49369November 09, 2016 03:15PM

  Re: Yep. DAnthony Thomas, Ace Saunder, Dexter McCluster etc.NM

CraigMatson363November 09, 2016 03:19PM

  Re: disagree

waterfield423November 10, 2016 03:09PM

  Could have had Mcleod and maybe Jenkins with that money

promomasterj519November 09, 2016 10:08AM

  Re: Could have had Mcleod and maybe Jenkins with that money

CraigMatson663November 09, 2016 03:08PM