Quote
max
It's a data point.
All it means to me is that it's more confirmation that Keenum is on shaky ground now.
See, when you keep an open mind you take in all the sights and sounds before you draw any conclusions.
One alternative is that you have a fixed position based on your own personal bias and shoot down everything that doesn't provide confirmation. I choose not to do that, but its your prerogative to take that position, like you did with the move to LA.
No you are incorrect. More confirmation that Keenum is on shaky ground isn't required. Everyone watching knows the clock is ticking, but there isn't anyone that can see the face of the clock to say who or when. What this is is a manufactured statement from Quinnabout a QB change that is eventually coming.
Seems to me you think that an awful lot of guys all over the country have "insider" knowledge of what Fisher is going to do. Weigh the possibility of that versus what you call data points (this is football not engineering LOL) and the fact that sports talk shows, and sports talk media, are less accurate than Josh Freeman and Stormtroopers from Star Wars.
It has nothing to do with an open mind as you say. But if you want to discuss probabilities I will. But if it's based on what radio hosts/shows say, and MOST especially ESPN affiliates there is nothing to talk about. That's simply not news/reporting.
