Quote
zn

Quote
RamUK
And even if I agree and think one of the ones you offered is most likel,y you undermine the credibility of your argument when you only offer anti-Fisher options.

The 4th would *could* be, he's making a good decision for the long-term success of Goff and the LA Rams.

Just playing Devil's Advocate.

IMO that;s more that being devil's advocate.

A list that doesn't include that option is just not being real.

...

IMO, that list is reality itself. It's what is actually happening.

Either Fisher (and staff) are incapable of getting Goff ready, this team/OL are in such a shambles that they can't risk putting him in, or Goff wasn't worth the boatload of picks we gave up for him. As the poster said, all 3 of those scenarios fall on Jeff's shoulders.

It "could be he's making a decision for the long-term success of Goff", but the operative word there is "could".
Fisher "could" be out of touch with today's NFL and his inability to adapt is costing us wins and the short & long term success of the Rams.

A list that doesn't include that option is just not being real.

Kevin P.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/07/2016 08:19AM by guinnessram.