Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I don't need other teams hit rates to determine

October 30, 2016 11:03AM
Quote
Deadpool
the Rams drafting on the offensive side of the ball is awful, terrible and downright pathetic. You qualify a hit as a starter, that's a pretty low bar for a team that does very little in free agency. i mean, someone HAS to start. Someone HAS to play significant minutes. That doesn't mean they are helping their team win.

Robinson starts, but is he helping his team win? Is he helping this team be above the 31st ranked offense? See what I mean.For a top 3 pick he is an absolute miss. Austin as a wr drafted 8th overall should be a difference maker. mike Evans drafted 8th overall is a difference maker, Beckham 12th overall is a difference maker, Julio Jones 6th overall is, well, you get the picture.

but then again, I'm not giving you the other 31 teams comparisons, so I fully expect you to call me wrong. And that's fine.

I don't think it IS awful or terrible. To me, awful or terrible is this (hits bolded, and on this I have a very lax criteria for a hit---someone who played a few years whether or not with the Rams and whether or not they were headcases):


2006-2008: Klopenstein, Byrd, Hagans, Setterstrom, Palmer, Leonard, Fry, Shackleford, Stanley, Avery, Greco, Burton, Schuening. 13 picks, 1 hit. 7.7%

2009-2011: Smith, Foster, Null, Ogbonnaya, Bradford, Saffold, Gilyard, Hoomanawanui, Onobun, Kendricks, Pettis, Salas. 12 picks, 3 hits. 25%

2012-2015: Quick, Pead, Givens, Watkins, Richardson, Austin, [Bailey], Jones, Stacy, Robinson, Mason], Gilbert, Van Dyk, Rhaney, Gurley, Havenstein, Brown, Mannion, Donnal, Sasser, Wichman. I think we don't know yet on Mannion and Rhaney. Other than that it's 19 picks, 7 hits. 36.8%...with Mannion yet to be determined.

Bad was 7.7%. 36.8% to me means okay, could be better. Not "bad."



....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/30/2016 11:05AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Les Snead

LARams171196October 28, 2016 08:09AM

  Because...

Ramsfsninmd524October 28, 2016 09:59AM

  the coach coaches (or not) and the snead acquires the talent.

PHDram421October 28, 2016 10:15AM

  Well....

Ramsfsninmd356October 28, 2016 10:35AM

  Re: Well....

PHDram502October 28, 2016 12:22PM

  The myth of Les the savior and the empty roster lives on

promomasterj405October 29, 2016 02:49PM

  You've gotta be kidding me!!!

RamUK398October 30, 2016 08:26AM

  Re: You've gotta be kidding me!!!

Rampage2K-644October 30, 2016 09:33AM

  Not a very good burn, all except for SJ are still playing

promomasterj326October 31, 2016 09:23AM

  17 percent

PHDram314October 31, 2016 10:07AM

  What percentage of current Rams will be playing 5 years from now

promomasterj280October 31, 2016 12:02PM

  Relative to all the picks he had...

jemach383October 29, 2016 03:34PM

  that's just demonstrably wrong

zn534October 29, 2016 03:59PM

  what is the definition of a hit? I have Snead at 30%

Deadpool499October 30, 2016 08:05AM

  Re: WoW that's just brutal...and right!!...NM...

laram513October 30, 2016 08:13AM

  Re: what is the definition of a hit? I have Snead at 30%

zn407October 30, 2016 08:23AM

  So Jemach might not be wrong on his assessment

Deadpool515October 30, 2016 09:41AM

  not really what I am saying

zn485October 30, 2016 10:11AM

  I don't need other teams hit rates to determine

Deadpool362October 30, 2016 10:32AM

  Re: I don't need other teams hit rates to determine

zn347October 30, 2016 11:03AM

  answer me this last question

Deadpool375October 30, 2016 11:20AM

  Re: answer me this last question

zn372October 30, 2016 01:31PM

  I agree with ZN

Rams_81331October 30, 2016 02:46PM

  thats cool, but those three are more like quick sand then a foundation

Deadpool378October 30, 2016 03:36PM

  Re: thats cool, but those three are more like quick sand then a foundation

zn324October 30, 2016 03:51PM

  Ram 81 mentioned foundation

Deadpool438October 30, 2016 04:02PM

  oh okay I misread

zn443October 30, 2016 04:15PM

  Re: I agree with ZN

poplarbluffman364November 01, 2016 02:40AM

  Re: Relative to all the picks he had...

David Deacon312November 01, 2016 01:39AM

  I also remember the days of 14-2

ferragamo79359October 30, 2016 11:08AM

  I tend agree...

jemach374October 29, 2016 03:30PM

  F&S made it possible to even HAVE all those picks in the 1st place....

SunTzu_vs_Camus439October 31, 2016 06:59AM

  Re: Les Snead

Rams43463October 28, 2016 10:06AM

  Re: Les Snead

LARams17421October 28, 2016 10:33AM

  Re: Les Snead

CraigMatson345October 29, 2016 04:18PM

  Re: Les Snead

73Ram347October 30, 2016 03:50AM

  Don't most GM's disappear during the season ?

IowaRam381October 29, 2016 04:21PM

  Re: Les Snead

BobCarl390October 30, 2016 06:30AM

  Re: Les Snead

poplarbluffman515October 31, 2016 10:47AM