October 28, 2016 10:33AM
Quote
laram
I was suggesting the Rams trade Long when he still had value and the shortsighted thinkers were dead set against it.

So what happens...the Rams end up giving Long Millions, and let him go for nothing.

Kenny Britt? LOL In his 8th NFL season he's on pace for a decent year.

Btw 1100 yds for a receiver is not what it used to be.

D. Hopkins had 1300yds receiving last season from who at qb???

Ram bar is so low 68yds per game seems like a lot I guess. confused smiley

I guess we see this one a bit differently, la.

Couple of things that make this an apples to oranges comparison, IMO.

1) You were clearly right about Long. The Rams released him 2 years later than they should have. Just for the record, I approved of his release. J Lau's too. But here's the thing. Long was in a steady decline AND grossly overpaid at the same time. Britt is in a steady 2 year incline and definitely not overpaid. And without stellar QB play, I might add. Can't let such a player go for a future 4th rounder. Just can't.

2) And the Rams (and their fans) should not be turning up their noses at a potential 1100 yard WR just yet, especially catching passes in this O from the likes of Keenum. Seems like forever since Holt had the last 1000 yard season for the Rams. TBH, Quick has pleasantly surprised me this year, too. I didn't think he had it in him. But if he keeps this up, I would welcome him back on a reasonable contract for '17. Never thought I would be posting that from my perspective of last summer, but there it is.

Speaking strictly for myself, I'm in no mood for letting productive O players get away next offseason. ANY productive O players. Right now, they're as scarce as hen's teeth. Lol.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  trade deadline: "logical moves' for every NFC team

LMU931021October 28, 2016 03:14AM

  Re: I agree...

laram484October 28, 2016 04:05AM

  i dont agree...

wv ram430October 28, 2016 05:36AM

  Re: i dont agree...

laram606October 28, 2016 05:49AM

  Re: i dont agree...

RFIP361October 28, 2016 05:53AM

  Concept is sound. Compensation is not.

RockRam362October 28, 2016 05:32AM

  Re: Concept is sound. Compensation is not.

laram354October 28, 2016 05:35AM

  Re: A trade for a QB as a comparable? Come on

dzrams274October 28, 2016 08:20AM

  Re:No the "incentive" is comparable...

laram473October 28, 2016 08:32AM

  Re: Re:No the "incentive" is comparable...

dzrams303October 28, 2016 09:18AM

  Not just a desperate trade partner

merlin344October 28, 2016 11:19AM

  I'd take a 4th for Britt

BigGame81346October 28, 2016 05:51AM

  The only reason that would make sense to me is

RamUK339October 28, 2016 07:55AM

  No GM would do that puleeeeeze

LesBaker368October 28, 2016 08:09AM

  Re: No GM would do that puleeeeeze

Rams43320October 28, 2016 09:57AM

  Re: Lol, I heard the same things with Chris Long...

laram314October 28, 2016 10:13AM

  Re: Lol, I heard the same things with Chris Long...

Rams43327October 28, 2016 10:33AM

  Re:What if the Rams finish 5-11, 6-10 or 7-9...

laram313October 28, 2016 11:17AM

  Re: Re:What if the Rams finish 5-11, 6-10 or 7-9...

Rams43397October 28, 2016 11:45AM

  Very good points

LesBaker297October 28, 2016 11:19AM

  I agree with you LA ..

no name336October 28, 2016 01:10PM

  depends how u see this year

wv ram323October 28, 2016 09:59AM

  Re: depends how u see this year

Rams43325October 28, 2016 10:11AM

  Britt is ok

wv ram368October 28, 2016 11:45AM

  Re: Britt is ok

dzrams324October 28, 2016 01:39PM

  And there we have it

LesBaker335October 28, 2016 02:00PM

  NO NO NO NO!!!!

ferragamo79443October 28, 2016 11:07AM

  Why - because of age - first time

Rams_81444October 28, 2016 01:45PM

  I'd only trade Britt for a 2nd rounder right now nm

six2stack366October 28, 2016 01:49PM