Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Well, he should be.

October 18, 2016 05:03PM
The Rams had 2 penalties that extended the Lions' drive (on third down), including another one on 4th down on one of Detroit's touchdowns that was declined. Had they not scored, they would have had another opportunity anyway.

They also had 2 penalties that stalled their own drive, both of which happened deep in their own territory, back-to-back, that turned a 3rd & 5 into a 3rd & 15. And that drive started on their own 10 as a result of a holding penalty on Benny's 30 yard kickoff return.

But I get what he's saying anyway. Penalties (in and of themselves) don't typically equate to a disproportionate amount of losses for the team that commits them. Last year Carolina had 7 fewer penalties on the year. The year before that, the Broncos and Rams had the same amount and Seattle led the league with 23 more. But all that said, this team doesn't the the weaponry to overcome them like those other teams if they come at inopportune times like described above.




SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Jeff Fisher 'not overly concerned' about rising penalties

RamBill537October 18, 2016 04:08AM

  Typical Fisher

RockRam467October 18, 2016 04:12AM

  it's not just the physical penalties......

21Dog363October 18, 2016 04:42AM

  Re: it's not just the physical penalties......

AlbaNY_Ram352October 18, 2016 04:58AM

  Question

Ram49277October 18, 2016 04:20PM

  Well, he should be.

-X-341October 18, 2016 05:03PM

  He should be with no extension

TonyHunter87326October 18, 2016 05:15PM

  what he actually said

zn370October 18, 2016 05:19PM

  Re: Jeff Fisher 'not overly concerned' about rising penalties

sacram318October 18, 2016 08:20PM

  Re: Jeff Fisher 'not overly concerned' about rising penalties

zn379October 18, 2016 08:22PM