October 12, 2016 08:01AM
Quote
LMU93
I certainly didn't see them that way going into Sunday. But I just bring it up since as I look at the sites that do more analytical rankings they have the Bills rated 8th (FootballOutsiders), 8th (TeamRankings.com) and 13th (PFF) overall.

Again not that the Rams didn't partly shoot themselves in the foot and underperform. But also just maybe they played one of the teams in the upper 1/3 of the league and one of the tougher opponents on their schedule.

It doesn't matter. They outplayed Buffalo in a lot of respects and only lost because turnovers led directly or indirectly to 13 points for the opposition. Even with all their issues, injuries, and struggles with this or that aspect of the game, in the end they just beat themselves.

I actually said before the game that Buffalo was a bigger test than Arizona was. If nothing else they have a very tough defense when it comes to points allowed. In fact they're ranked 5th in that right now according to PFR, and that was with a bad game where they gave up 37 points to the Jets.

In the previous 3 games the Rams fought and scrapped and found a way to win. And that was WITH a healthy DL. In this one they fought and scrapped WITHOUT a healthy DL but handed the other team 13 points on turnovers. 20, if you count the botched fake punt, which gave them the ball in scoring distance.

....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  so, what if Buffalo is a top 10 team?...

LMU93647October 12, 2016 07:53AM

  Re: so, what if Buffalo is a top 10 team?...

zn391October 12, 2016 08:01AM

  Re: so, what if Buffalo is a top 10 team?...

Rams43359October 12, 2016 08:14AM

  Re: so, what if Buffalo is a top 10 team?...

zn309October 12, 2016 08:22AM

  Re: so, what if Buffalo is a top 10 team?...

RamsDynasty489October 12, 2016 08:30AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

laram331October 12, 2016 08:42AM

  Agree with all that...

PaulButcher59525October 12, 2016 08:51AM

  Re: well I do disagree for sure on some of that

Speed_Kills305October 12, 2016 09:04AM

  I agree with that (nm) (NM) (nm)

zn344October 12, 2016 09:51AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

Rampage2K-378October 12, 2016 09:23AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

zn322October 12, 2016 09:38AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

Rampage2K-294October 12, 2016 09:45AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

zn309October 12, 2016 09:47AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

Rampage2K-348October 12, 2016 10:03AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

zn314October 12, 2016 10:36AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

Rampage2K-364October 13, 2016 09:12AM

  Re: IMO the Rams were never in control of that game...

zn306October 13, 2016 01:55PM

  Re: there were a ton of good plays - explosive plays

Speed_Kills287October 12, 2016 10:45AM

  Re: the Woods drop

Speed_Kills298October 12, 2016 10:43AM

  Re: That's old news...

laram346October 12, 2016 10:50AM

  Re: ok but

Speed_Kills294October 12, 2016 11:04AM

  So did Tampa Beat themselves or the Rams win

ferragamo79292October 12, 2016 09:52AM

  Re: just to be clear

Speed_Kills250October 12, 2016 10:48AM

  that was directed at another poster

ferragamo79360October 12, 2016 11:42AM

  I'm with you on this

GreatRamNTheSky376October 12, 2016 10:40PM

  Then it's obvious we're not! nm

jemach176October 13, 2016 02:08AM

  Certainly not with a backup QB

LesBaker331October 13, 2016 10:15AM

  The Bills are a solid team

LesBaker343October 13, 2016 10:12AM