| October 08, 2016 07:01AM |
Right now the range seems to be this, which is more or less what I expected.
Only 4% think the Rams would not be winning without him. (That's not how I voted btw.)
64% voted anywhere from "he's a gamer who is better than you would think if you only count measurables" to "he had a couple of bad games but you can win with him."
32% think anywhere from "he can be okay sometimes but is too limited physically" to "he's a complete waste and worse than Keith Null"
Inexplicably, 20% said "I like to eat the store-brand packaged cookie dough without actually baking the cookies."
That's not only off-topic, it makes the poll results add up to more than 100%.
.
.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/08/2016 07:01AM by zn.
Only 4% think the Rams would not be winning without him. (That's not how I voted btw.)
64% voted anywhere from "he's a gamer who is better than you would think if you only count measurables" to "he had a couple of bad games but you can win with him."
32% think anywhere from "he can be okay sometimes but is too limited physically" to "he's a complete waste and worse than Keith Null"
Inexplicably, 20% said "I like to eat the store-brand packaged cookie dough without actually baking the cookies."
That's not only off-topic, it makes the poll results add up to more than 100%.
.
.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/08/2016 07:01AM by zn.
