Re: Poll: Keenum

Quote
zn
Right now the range seems to be this, which is more or less what I expected.

Only 4% think the Rams would not be winning without him. (That's not how I voted btw.)

64% voted anywhere from "he's a gamer who is better than you would think if you only count measurables" to "he had a couple of bad games but you can win with him."

32% think anywhere from "he can be okay sometimes but is too limited physically" to "he's a complete waste and worse than Keith Null"

Inexplicably, 20% said "I like to eat the store-brand packaged cookie dough without actually baking the cookies."

That's not only off-topic, it makes the poll results add up to more than 100%.
.

QZVB9.jpg.jpg

.

Now it's this. Discounting the one vote for "best qb since Warner" (since I posted that as a joke and I assume it was a joking response, unless I am told otherwise)....


Still only 4% think the Rams would not be winning without him. (That's not how I voted btw.)

58% voted in the range anywhere from "he's a gamer who is better than you would think if you only count measurables" to "he had a couple of bad games but you can win with him."

36% voted in the range anywhere from "he can be okay sometimes but is too limited physically" to "he's a complete waste and worse than Keith Null"

Another way to look at it is that 49% voted in the range anywhere from "he has had a couple of bad games but you can win with him" to "he can be okay sometimes but is too limited physically," while 48% voted in the range anywhere from "Rams would not be winning without him" to "he's a gamer who is better than you would think if you only count measurables."

But then this approach doesn't account for the multiple voters.



..



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/08/2016 07:56PM by zn.