October 02, 2016 11:16AM
Quote
LesBaker
Spell it out. Because what I see the Rams doing is EXACTLY what they said would happen.

It's not complicated, Les. Not hard to spell this one out.

They gave up 6 premium picks for the #1 overall spot and picked Goff.

Goff has yet to take an NFL snap and won't today, barring a Keenum injury.

Meanwhile, 3-4 other rookie QB's are not only starting, but impressing.

JT referred to whispers of Goff leadership shortcomings in his last chat.

Fisher's track record of developing skill position O players is not comforting, to say the least.


So sure, we can all talk about patience and assure each other that Goff will start whenever Fisher thinks he's "ready".

Don't know about you, but I think it's one of two things...

Either Fisher picked the wrong QB.

OR Fisher and his staff are not competent to develop their own #1 overall selection.

Or both...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  This is strictly FWIW, fellas...

Rams43513October 02, 2016 10:14AM

  Re: This is strictly FWIW, fellas...

zn237October 02, 2016 10:16AM

  That Goff will play when he is judged to be ready

Hazlet Hacksaw215October 02, 2016 10:17AM

  Re: That Goff will play when he is judged to be ready

Rams43217October 02, 2016 10:29AM

  Re: That Goff will play when he is judged to be ready

zn213October 02, 2016 10:32AM

  Re: That Goff will play when he is judged to be ready

Rams43210October 02, 2016 10:39AM

  Re: That Goff will play when he is judged to be ready

zn200October 02, 2016 10:42AM

  I hope the Rams keep winning

Hazlet Hacksaw223October 02, 2016 10:33AM

  Re: I hope the Rams keep winning

Rams43206October 02, 2016 10:42AM

  And that's just undeniable

9er8er210October 02, 2016 10:28AM

  Re: And that's just undeniable

max276October 02, 2016 10:53AM

  Oh puleeeeeze

LesBaker277October 02, 2016 11:01AM

  Not good arguments at all

9er8er210October 02, 2016 11:17AM

  It defies logic.

max193October 02, 2016 11:29AM

  Yes. they overpaid...

max206October 02, 2016 11:25AM

  We should conclude...

Saguaro222October 02, 2016 10:38AM

  Re: We should conclude...

Rams43207October 02, 2016 10:50AM

  Definitely not a Fisher defender here.

Saguaro206October 02, 2016 11:01AM

  What exactly is "on the coaches"?

LesBaker189October 02, 2016 11:02AM

  Re: What exactly is "on the coaches"?

Rams43297October 02, 2016 11:16AM

  Two things

LesBaker196October 02, 2016 11:32AM

  That was really one big irrelevant thing

9er8er192October 02, 2016 12:46PM

  He wouldn't be alone

9er8er209October 02, 2016 10:53AM

  Re: Yeah

Shaky292October 02, 2016 11:22AM