Nobody you've been responding to has been arguing that we shouldn't or can't wait and see how Goff turns out.
And I know I don't care that you don't care about measuring Goff against his peers. It couldn't be more obvious that you don't care about that right now only because it's not a point you can win right now, which is why nobody should care that you don't care.
The most important thing you said here is that you don't think the magnitude of the investment is critical to the quality of asset as best as can be determined at this point. And that is all you really have to say. You implicitly endorse a strategy that says push the whole pile into the middle of the table no matter what your hand looks like after the first turn and hope for the best for the sake of, and ONLY for the sake of, 'anything can happen.' Well, at least you've gotten the team you deserve all these years since it apparently shares your philosophy. But it's that cavalier, uncritical approach that is actually reason for concern for some people.
And one final point about something you got completely wrong. What they've were clear about is that the goal, the plan, was to start him game one. They said they wouldn't start him until he was ready, but the goal was week one. Goal wasn't reached, so now the question is why? What is it about the massive investment itself or the coaching or both that prevented it? You don't care, anything can happen, you can always name an exception, yada, yeads....... I get it. But, some do care since the answer to that question is crucial to understanding the team's and Goff's future and whether they and he even have one under this regime.
