Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

FootballOutsiders comment on Rams' the 2 point conversion decision

September 26, 2016 09:37AM
"Rams get a score on a Tavon Austin big play to go ahead 37-26. And go for 2. They didn't get it. But this was bad. This was not good. This was not right. This was wrong. An 11-point game can be a field goal and touchdown game. If the Bucs score a touchdown and get a two-point conversion, they can tie the game with just a field goal. With 4.5 minutes to play, William Krasker's chart has the break-even rate at about 87 PERCENT. This makes sense, because being up 13 doesn't get you that much (the chart pre-dates the XP rule change, and Aguayo, granted, but two touchdowns by Tampa still gives them a great chance to win), and 11 is not that much. Fortunately for Fisher, who normally is savvy to strategic considerations even if he is philosophically conservative, the Buccaneers failed when they went for two after cutting the deficit to 37-32. But it's still an error."
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I didn't hate the 2point conversion decision. In fact I kind of liked it.

ArizonaRamFan786September 26, 2016 06:51AM

  Re: I didn't hate the 2point conversion decision. In fact I kind of liked it.

Rampage2K-490September 26, 2016 06:59AM

  No disrespect, but...

mexram389September 26, 2016 12:59PM

  Re: No disrespect, but...

Rampage2K-366September 26, 2016 01:21PM

  Re: I thought it was a BAD decision

RamsFanSinceLA395September 26, 2016 07:07AM

  Re: I didn't hate the 2point conversion decision. In fact I kind of liked it.

RFIP404September 26, 2016 07:07AM

  I liked the long throw @2:00, also .nm

ArizonaRamFan319September 26, 2016 08:01AM

  Agreed on both points (nm)

Suh-weet!562September 26, 2016 09:43AM

  It's about odds really

headslapper558September 26, 2016 07:13AM

  Re: It's about odds really

Rampage2K-369September 26, 2016 07:20AM

  Re: It's about odds really

headslapper434September 26, 2016 08:22AM

  Stupid. Plain and simple

dodgerram394September 26, 2016 07:21AM

  Was it Fisher's decision or

waterfield344September 26, 2016 07:43AM

  Re: Was it Fisher's decision or

Rampage2K-371September 26, 2016 07:48AM

  Re: Was it Fisher's decision or

RFIP354September 26, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: Was it Fisher's decision or

Rampage2K-343September 26, 2016 08:04AM

  Re: I didn't hate the 2point conversion decision. In fact I kind of liked it.

Rams43352September 26, 2016 07:27AM

  I wasn't very happy..

sstrams351September 26, 2016 07:45AM

  I have a feeling....

sacram353September 26, 2016 09:00AM

  ha, certainly not

ArizonaRamFan333September 26, 2016 09:55AM

  FootballOutsiders comment on Rams' the 2 point conversion decision

LMU93546September 26, 2016 09:37AM

  Re: FootballOutsiders comment on Rams' the 2 point conversion decision

Rampage2K-351September 26, 2016 09:43AM

  Re: I didn't hate the 2point conversion decision. In fact I kind of liked it.

Barf33430September 26, 2016 09:54AM

  again.

ArizonaRamFan328September 26, 2016 09:57AM

  Re: again.

Barf33407September 26, 2016 12:33PM

  I understand that and don't blame you one bit .nm

ArizonaRamFan319September 26, 2016 12:37PM

  Re: I understand that and don't blame you one bit .nm

Barf33384September 26, 2016 12:41PM

  Aggression?

moklerman374September 26, 2016 10:16AM

  Re: Aggression? It was a brain fart, plain & simple.

guinnessram336September 26, 2016 11:15AM

  the play itself was horrific

Cornelius253September 26, 2016 11:20AM

  I hated the actual call on the play

ArizonaRamFan345September 26, 2016 11:23AM

  Re Keenum changed the play at the los

Speed_Kills391September 26, 2016 12:50PM