Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Hey look, a team got a rookie ready in 1 week and won.

September 23, 2016 11:44AM
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
promomasterj
Hmm. I guess it's possible. Let's see - simplified the gameplan, didn't ask the qb to do too much, played lights out defense and special teams, ran the ball effectively and blocked. And why again can't Goff step on the field? Perhaps it's not the QB's that have been letting the Rams team down, maybe for the past couple years it's been the team letting the QB's down.

But then, I don't want to be too negative.

Not that you're being too negative , you're being too simplistic.

Of course IF the Rams were forced to start Goff due to injury, then he would start and prolly have a simplistic game plan to help out, BUT they aren't.

It's not their plan, I don't get the constant handwringing that goes on around here about that plan.

Much of the handwringing is caused by the belief that a simplistic game plan with Goff couldn't do any worse than 4.5 pts a game, and probably do better.

If Keenum was at least a top 25 QB, it wouldn't be so bad. But he's #33 with a passer rating of 57.8. Minny has 2 QBs who are higher.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Hey look, a team got a rookie ready in 1 week and won.

promomasterj526September 23, 2016 08:33AM

  Re: Hey look, a team got a rookie ready in 1 week and won.

Rampage2K-373September 23, 2016 08:40AM

  Don't like plan that invests snaps in a QB who won't be here next year

promomasterj346September 23, 2016 11:41AM

  Re: Don't like plan that invests snaps in a QB who won't be here next year

RamsFanFromRio375September 23, 2016 11:48AM

  That's correct

LesBaker391September 23, 2016 11:54AM

  Re: Hey look, a team got a rookie ready in 1 week and won.

max322September 23, 2016 11:44AM

  Re: Hey look, a team got a rookie ready in 1 week and won.

Rampage2K-315September 23, 2016 11:52AM

  Goff doesn't have to be better than Case, just as good or slightly worse

promomasterj319September 23, 2016 12:09PM