Quote
Rams43
Why did the Rams use their 90th roster spot on a DT? Hmmmmm?
Is that an indication of some dissatisfaction with their DT corps?
Were they simply in love with this kids potential and think he might be a gem?
Are they really pleased with their depth at every single other position group?
I don't think that they needed him for a camp body at that position, did they?
Kinda curious when one really thinks about it, huh?
I mean, weren't there any promising players out there at the following positions:
A serious competitor for GZ as PK.
A potential backup C.
Maybe a CB candidate.
A promising deep Safety that they've had their eye on.
But no, they added a DT. Makes me wonder just what's below the surface that I'm not seeing. Not losing sleep over it, of course. But S&F always have a reason for personnel moves, sooooo...
How about this instead. They had a spot available and signed guys according to how they were ranked, regardless of position. For all we know at this point that's as valid a view as any darkly suspicious one. Notice they didn't cut anyone. They were just bringing the roster up to 90.
.
