Re: Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

March 07, 2024 05:51AM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 7,227
Status: HOF Inductee

Quote
Classicalwit
I'm not excited by any of those names. They all feel like washouts to be honest.

I agree. Rams should swing for the fences with Danielle Hunter. He is a monster in the Von Miller mode and would probably be even better with AD .
The three names mentioned are fine players and would fit as rotational guys. But Hunter is a different beast.

Go Rams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?	since68	248	March 06, 2024 07:28PM
Re: Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?	Classicalwit	66	March 07, 2024 04:40AM
Re: Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?	dodgerram	41	March 07, 2024 05:51AM
Picked Hunter but Van Ginkel is the edge Mcvay wanted hoecht to be	Ram_Ruler	48	March 07, 2024 04:55AM

Previous Message Next Message

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

RamsFootballFans.com Bucky's Pub The RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate Party Game Time Forum Help and Support Forum Jack Youngblood Chat Jim Everett Chat Kevin Demoff Chat Deacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&A Announcements Recent Messages

Re: Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?

Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?

Re: Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?

Re: Which "cheap" but productive EDGE should the Rams sign ?

Picked Hunter but Van Ginkel is the edge Mcvay wanted hoecht to be