February 23, 2024 04:59AM
Quote
RockRam
The Rams are going a bit different way. They're going to build for a longer haul, to a degree. And giving up 2 number 1's plus an above $20mil per year contract is not the solution. One #1? Maybe if they think he is in the Von Miller/younger Khalil Mack category (I sure don't).

I'm so with you on this. I'd rather bet on a solid draft than bet a boatload of picks on a guy who's production dipped while he was working for a deal.

Pass.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams trade offer for Brian Burns in 2022 is still impacting contract talks…

Rams43344February 22, 2024 06:17AM

  I never offer the same thing 2x's.....

roman1893February 22, 2024 06:28AM

  Rams aren't going to rejoin that group

RockRam95February 22, 2024 06:36AM

  Re: Rams aren't going to rejoin that group

Old Goat27February 23, 2024 04:59AM

  Move on from Brian Burns

NewMexicoRam144February 22, 2024 06:44AM

  agreed

Speed_Kills79February 22, 2024 06:49AM

  Re: agreed

dodgerram82February 22, 2024 06:51AM

  right sign a free agent and save the picks

ferragamo7984February 22, 2024 07:16AM

  Max Crosby

GlacieRam64February 23, 2024 03:03AM

  Re: Rams trade offer for Brian Burns in 2022 is still impacting contract talks…

LaDoc64February 22, 2024 08:16AM

  drafts have been awful except last year

ferragamo7935February 22, 2024 05:57PM

  Re: Rams trade offer for Brian Burns in 2022 is still impacting contract talks…

bigjimram2163February 22, 2024 08:41AM

  Re: In 2022, the trade makes a lot of sense for the Rams......

oldschoolramfan37February 22, 2024 04:59PM

  Re: Rams trade offer for Brian Burns in 2022 is still impacting contract talks…

Ridgewood Ram39February 23, 2024 03:15AM