That's not the problem.
The ongoing selective, slanted, lopsided enforcement of the rules is the problem. As we peel the onion we see a longstanding and ominous problem spreading like a cancer from the playing field to the halls where the bets are laid and the payoffs are made.
The league profits from its collusion with the gaming industry. And it appears too often and too blatently that officiating - how the league enforces the rules - tends to benefit the teams that are favored to win.
In the offensive offsides call in question, the rule is there and the call was legitimate. Point won.
How, when, and why the call was made - and why another critical and more egregious non-call that followed wasn't called, and how a growning tendency toward selev ctive officiating is corrupting the game - and why - are questions that emerged from this particular play, in this spotlight, and with this high-profile player "losing it" for a few moments (never mind the substance of his later remarks in the press conference that immediately followed) age questions that beg out-loud to be addressed.
And we get that, too.