Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Two things…

December 04, 2023 08:21AM
Very nice post, 71, btw.

First thing you stated yourself. Garrett wasn’t himself due to injury. Not even close, despite his refusal to use that as an excuse. Having said that, I watched Jackson closely and thought he did have a helluva game. Not a stretch to say he seems to be continuing to evolve. So, perhaps LOT is not Rams biggest need right now.

Second thing is it all depends on who’s sitting there at our pick. If it’s a LOT then so be it. Same with any other position. An elite player that falls at ANY position would be most welcome.

My position continues to be that a future franchise QB to eventually replace Stafford would be doable, possibly with a trade up. Snead has been there before and done so quite effectively to get that QB that Rams really like. Yep, it’s risky, but the rewards are off the charts if Snead nails it (again).

All we can do now is stay tuned and see how all this unfolds.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  No Sacks for Garrett! Do we use a high pick on a LT?

Ramsfan1971160December 04, 2023 07:47AM

  Re: No Sacks for Garrett! Do we use a high pick on a LT?

LMU9370December 04, 2023 08:19AM

  agree obviously its a position that the Rams

Speed_Kills59December 04, 2023 08:42AM

  Two things…

Rams4383December 04, 2023 08:21AM

  Re: Two things…

Islander Ram57December 04, 2023 08:39AM

  RFIP nm

Speed_Kills83December 04, 2023 08:40AM