Obviously he had a terrible game yesterday..... how much to read into that? I don't know.... I know what I saw in his first game was real, not an illusion.... yesterday I'm assuming, not having seen the game, that he did what rookie's are prone to do in their first year. So "The rookie screwed up in his 3rd preseason game" isn't a complete 'shock' to me.
That he probably ain't the best choice for being the #2 I'd say is very, very likely.
With or without a competent #2 I'm all for carrying 3 QB's. This one befuddles me.... I haven't heard a single argument against carrying 3 QB's that I consider a good argument. - JamesJM
