Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Makes sense

June 29, 2023 02:16PM
Quote
LMU93
I would have put Dickerson's 1984 as #1 but it's splitting hairs. .

If someone said Dickerson '84 over Faulk '00
it would be totally fair. I only skimmed it so if crap
passing game was not mentioned it should have been

It's a coin flip for me, either one is reasonable.

I didn't remember Faulk didn't fumble in '00. I DO
remember Dickerson fumbling a lot with the Rams, esp in 1986
playoffs.

Controversial question---How close is Gurley or Jackson to
the top 2?

If Faulk and Dickerson seasons are a 9.9 and 9.8
are the other two something like 9.7 and 9.6
or something like 9.3 and 9.2?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/29/2023 02:19PM by JimYoungblood53.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Ram On: Ranking Best Years of Franchise's 20 Best Backs

JimYoungblood53413June 29, 2023 10:54AM

  some underrated ones in there

LMU9377June 29, 2023 01:26PM

  Makes sense

JimYoungblood5369June 29, 2023 02:16PM

  Re: ED fumbling in Washington

leafnose52July 01, 2023 10:04AM

  Man that was bad... we had a chance in that game ...

JimYoungblood5344July 01, 2023 10:22AM

  went back read whole thing---Dickerson '84 > Faulk '00?

JimYoungblood5354June 30, 2023 01:29PM

  neck and neck

LMU9340July 01, 2023 06:31AM

  Yeah, and all the other things Faulk brougt

JimYoungblood5340July 01, 2023 07:34AM

  Re: Ram On: Ranking Best Years of Franchise's 20 Best Backs

mtramfan46June 30, 2023 02:13PM

  John Drake? Liked seeing Dick Bass and McCutcheon, though

JimYoungblood5348June 30, 2023 04:50PM

  Re: Franchise's 20 Best Backs.....and worst

leafnose45July 02, 2023 10:00AM