Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Did Rams have eyes on Hooker at 69?

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
PSJRam
April 29, 2023 07:14AM
I was thinking the same exact thing. Why trade up to just in front of the Rams to get the pick unless you think the Rams are likely to grab Hooker up.
I actually wondered if there was someone if the Rams war room sharing information with Detroit. But, I'm a conspiracy theory lover, too. Just seemed fishy to me.
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Did Rams have eyes on Hooker at 69?

Rampage2K-166April 29, 2023 06:58AM

  Re: Did Rams have eyes on Hooker at 69?

Ridgewood Ram62April 29, 2023 07:01AM

  Hard to imagine given Stafford's contact

1st Rounder62April 29, 2023 07:02AM

  Re: Hard to imagine given Stafford's contact

headslapper65April 29, 2023 07:12AM

  Re: Did Rams have eyes on Hooker at 69?

PSJRam51April 29, 2023 07:14AM

  Re: Did Rams have eyes on Hooker at 69?

Rampage2K-47April 29, 2023 07:24AM

  Lions want a competent back-up QB

ABQRam65April 29, 2023 07:55AM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages