Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Rams 3rd down conversions in that game

October 11, 2017 05:00AM
Quote
Steve
Exactly, MR ZN....I am happy some are supporting truth....thanks again for removing the cloud over this string.

Also, it is clear to all of us that the Rams had an 'off' game--and Seattle was part of that, for sure. The speed of their defense, and intelligence was a 'new' thing for Goff, and the whole team.

From all of this, I think we will NOW see Watkins the competitor....and the lil beast will be fed (no, not Tavon)

The only thing we disagree on, and it's minor, is Watkins and Tavon. We might view those 2 things differently. Both issues will attract diverse opinions and there will be no set consensus on either issue...just people seeing things differently.

In terms of the rest we agree. Seattle's veteran defense made things harder for the Rams new and young offense, and the offense still managed to be competitive. That's a very good sign. They made mistakes but that was just one game when it comes to that and they will learn from it.

So overall they were very competitive, and 3rd down was one of the ways they did that. They actually had a fairly high 3rd down conversion rate.




...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2017 05:14AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Watkins wide open for TD Attachments

govane1138October 10, 2017 06:34PM

  Re: Goff strip sack Attachments

govane382October 10, 2017 06:42PM

  Re: Goff strip sack

Rampage2K-267October 10, 2017 06:53PM

  Re: Goff strip sack

govane254October 10, 2017 06:59PM

  Re: Goff strip sack

Rampage2K-212October 10, 2017 07:19PM

  Re: Goff strip sack

govane206October 10, 2017 07:25PM

  And 3-step drop from shotgun is a 7-step depth

Blue and Gold199October 10, 2017 07:30PM

  Re: Goff strip sack

dzrams177October 10, 2017 07:39PM

  2.34 seconds?

no name158October 11, 2017 03:31PM

  Re: 2.34 seconds?

govane162October 11, 2017 04:51PM

  Re: 2.34 seconds?

no name146October 11, 2017 06:43PM

  Re: 2.34 seconds?

govane129October 12, 2017 08:07AM

  Re: 2.34 seconds?

no name135October 12, 2017 08:23AM

  Re: Goff strip sack

Steve176October 10, 2017 08:06PM

  Re: Goff strip sack

govane173October 10, 2017 08:12PM

  Then why go after him on the play a few plays before GZ misses FG?

Blue and Gold168October 10, 2017 08:17PM

  Re: Then why go after him on the play a few plays before GZ misses FG?

govane171October 10, 2017 08:53PM

  Rams 3rd down conversions in that game

zn177October 10, 2017 09:21PM

  It's not in the stats.. right now...

JamesJM164October 10, 2017 09:51PM

  oh I agree

zn166October 10, 2017 10:06PM

  Yup, and to come right out and say it.. here it is...

JamesJM164October 10, 2017 10:47PM

  James...(edited cause I misread)

zn138October 11, 2017 04:47AM

  My apologies for that...

JamesJM146October 11, 2017 08:12AM

  Re: My apologies for that...

zn148October 11, 2017 08:25AM

  Re: Rams 3rd down conversions in that game

Steve142October 10, 2017 11:21PM

  Re: Rams 3rd down conversions in that game

zn133October 11, 2017 05:00AM

  Re: Then why go after him on the play a few plays before GZ misses FG?

Blue and Gold140October 11, 2017 04:30AM

  Re: Then why go after him on the play a few plays before GZ misses FG? Attachments

govane170October 11, 2017 07:46AM

  laram nm

Speed_Kills135October 11, 2017 10:57AM

  Free la -nm

Old Goat118October 12, 2017 01:05PM

  laram as Andy Dufresne

Los Angeles Lenny136October 12, 2017 03:08PM

  Cover-1, Thomas bit on the shallow crosser by Woods

Blue and Gold196October 10, 2017 06:49PM

  Re: Goff interception Attachments

govane305October 10, 2017 06:53PM

  Re: Goff interception

Al45210October 10, 2017 07:02PM

  He saw him Attachments

Blue and Gold225October 10, 2017 07:24PM

  Re: He saw him

govane148October 10, 2017 07:27PM

  But then 54 was playing the middle/hook zone Attachments

Blue and Gold235October 10, 2017 08:23PM

  Re: But then 54 was playing the middle/hook zone Attachments

govane150October 11, 2017 08:28AM

  All I can say is versus a short zone, the under route would not be 1st read

Blue and Gold129October 11, 2017 01:14PM

  Re: Another potential TD miss to Watkins Attachments

govane233October 10, 2017 08:01PM

  he checked it down for a 1st down (was 3rd and 11) Attachments

Blue and Gold214October 10, 2017 08:16PM

  Re: he checked it down for a 1st down (was 3rd and 11) Attachments

govane182October 10, 2017 08:24PM

  I posted that earlier

Blue and Gold146October 10, 2017 08:25PM

  Re: Kupp miss for huge gain Attachments

govane236October 10, 2017 08:17PM

  a lotta traffic where Kupp headed Attachments

Blue and Gold174October 10, 2017 08:32PM

  Re: a lotta traffic where Kupp headed

govane152October 10, 2017 08:57PM

  Re: a lotta traffic where Kupp headed

Steve140October 10, 2017 11:23PM

  Re: lol

Speed_Kills149October 11, 2017 04:43AM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD Attachments

govane214October 11, 2017 08:50AM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD

Rampage2K-170October 11, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD

govane168October 11, 2017 12:20PM

  It is interesting. this one Attachments

Blue and Gold114October 12, 2017 11:57AM

  Re: It is interesting. this one Attachments

govane132October 12, 2017 12:20PM

  My guess is he's looking off safety there

Blue and Gold128October 12, 2017 12:31PM

  Re: My guess is he's looking off safety there

govane120October 12, 2017 12:35PM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD

dzrams124October 12, 2017 12:47PM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD Attachments

govane134October 12, 2017 01:00PM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD

RamsFanSinceLA119October 12, 2017 01:29PM

  Re: Watkins open for another TD

govane117October 12, 2017 02:11PM

  Are you Watkins agent?

promomasterj158October 11, 2017 01:02PM

  I see it differently - I think these photos are undeniable

Rams_81141October 11, 2017 06:47PM

  Not undeniable at all...

RamFanEsq126October 12, 2017 06:03AM

  Geometry

Rams_81132October 12, 2017 09:50AM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD (VIDEO)

-X-211October 11, 2017 05:37PM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD (VIDEO)

napoli150October 11, 2017 06:36PM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD (VIDEO)

RamFanEsq144October 11, 2017 07:36PM

  Re: Goff has to want to go there initially

Speed_Kills145October 12, 2017 05:58AM

  Goff isn't looking for Watkins because of two things...

max140October 12, 2017 09:15AM

  Re: Goff isn't looking for Watkins because of two things...

oldschoolramfan124October 12, 2017 09:20AM

  You're putting too much of it on Goff, point the finger at McVay too

max132October 12, 2017 10:13AM

  Re: You're putting too much of it on Goff, point the finger at McVay too

oldschoolramfan111October 12, 2017 06:20PM

  Re: all of that or as B&G says below

Speed_Kills131October 12, 2017 10:09AM

  I think it likely, and to be expected...

JamesJM122October 12, 2017 10:19AM

  Re: I don't know about being ahead of the curve

Speed_Kills142October 12, 2017 10:53AM

  Just my perception of things so far...

JamesJM128October 12, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: yup I hear ya nm

Speed_Kills107October 12, 2017 02:04PM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD (VIDEO)

govane107October 12, 2017 08:14AM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD (VIDEO) Attachments

Blue and Gold149October 12, 2017 08:28AM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD (VIDEO) Attachments

govane140October 12, 2017 08:43AM

  I think it's possible, even likely that McVay has Goff

Blue and Gold129October 12, 2017 09:02AM

  This still pic shows you are wrong...

RamFanEsq146October 12, 2017 10:05AM

  Re: This still shows you are wrong...

Rampage2K-139October 12, 2017 10:06AM

  Goff and the WRs are watching these as well

LMU93155October 12, 2017 12:19PM

  Re: Watkins wide open for TD

dodgerram121October 12, 2017 08:33PM