Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile


I think the difference has to do with priorities

April 22, 2017 02:35AM
I actually have little to disagree with in what you said. Which is why I've said in numerous other posts that if an Edge Rusher is sitting there at 37, and he is clearly graded as above any offensive skill player, then they should take him. And for the reasons you said.

But......there is no reason to think that Quinn won't be able to play the position (in fact, I think he's well suited to it), and playing upright and attacking the QB from different angles without trying to fight through OTs and DTs ought to benefit him healthwise, unless his back is just too badly damaged to allow very much contact at all. In which case retirement may come much sooner than later.

But if the draft is as deep as you believe it to be in Edge Rushers, then we also ought to be able to get one past the 2nd round.
Besides: the Achilles Heel for the Rams for many years has been poor offensive output. Over the past 10 years, the BEST they have done is to be 21st ranked (one time), and the last 2 years they have been 29 and 32. And inbetween in the mid-late 20's. In other words......really, really, really awful.

So to me, it is about priorities. And offense must be the priority in this draft. Again; I do agree that if a potentially great Edge Rusher has for some reason dropped into our lap at 37, you probably take him. But what if a potentially great WR or TE drops into our laps at 37? I would likely take the offensive player.

I also feel that the offense putting points on the board is both a psychological and actual lift for the Defense.

  Every NFL Team’s Biggest Draft Need

RamBill1025April 19, 2017 06:49AM

  These guys get it

RFIP403April 19, 2017 07:26AM

  Re: +1

TonyHunter87391April 19, 2017 08:28AM

  Re: These guys get it

Rams43244April 19, 2017 09:40AM

  Re: interesting they mention Ford there at 37

merlin235April 19, 2017 10:04AM

  Re: Ford at 37?

leafnose292April 20, 2017 04:15AM

  If Goff is what he's supposed to be

9er8er298April 20, 2017 04:13PM

  Biggest impact would be an OC

max250April 20, 2017 04:27PM

  I agree

9er8er264April 20, 2017 04:54PM

  Re: I agree

max264April 20, 2017 05:33PM

  Re: I agree

max219April 21, 2017 04:20AM

  Re: I agree

oldschoolramfan214April 21, 2017 06:23AM

  Re: I agree

Rams43206April 21, 2017 08:12AM

  Re: I agree

max159April 21, 2017 12:51PM

  Not to mention..

RFIP204April 22, 2017 03:40AM


max117April 22, 2017 04:24AM

  Re: I agree

9er8er115April 22, 2017 11:28AM

  Re: I agree

Rams43137April 22, 2017 11:49AM


9er8er128April 22, 2017 12:10PM

  Re: Whoa!

Rams43133April 22, 2017 12:14PM

  Nope, didn't miss it

9er8er191April 22, 2017 12:18PM

  Re: Nope, didn't miss it

Rams43101April 22, 2017 12:33PM

  No, I'm consistent

9er8er164April 22, 2017 01:29PM

  Re: No, I'm consistent

Rams43187April 22, 2017 06:01PM

  I'm saying what I said to start this thread

9er8er107April 23, 2017 08:28AM

  Re: I'm saying what I said to start this thread

Rams43105April 23, 2017 11:31AM


9er8er104April 23, 2017 02:56PM

  Re: No

Rams43131April 23, 2017 06:11PM

  I'll just quote what you said

9er8er183April 23, 2017 07:28PM

  Re: I'll just quote what you said

Rams43304April 23, 2017 07:36PM

  Re: 0 – 15%

dzrams179April 21, 2017 08:45AM

  I don't see LB as a need

RockRam344April 21, 2017 11:07AM

  I do, here's why

zn246April 21, 2017 03:04PM

  I think the difference has to do with priorities

RockRam213April 22, 2017 02:35AM

  Re: I think the difference has to do with priorities

zn160April 22, 2017 04:04AM

  Yes, but if you can't do both, which do you do?

RockRam141April 22, 2017 05:13AM

  This is simple, you protect your major investment...

max128April 22, 2017 05:37AM

  Re: This is simple, you protect your major investment...

PHDram115April 22, 2017 05:47AM

  Re: This is simple, you protect your major investment...

Rams43178April 22, 2017 05:51AM

  Re: This is simple, you protect your major investment...

max201April 22, 2017 07:55AM

  well I've already answered that

zn201April 22, 2017 07:04AM

  It's a huge need

9er8er169April 22, 2017 11:40AM

  Re: Ogletree?

dzrams142April 22, 2017 06:27PM

  Re: Ogletree?

9er8er124April 23, 2017 08:32AM

  Re: Ogletree?

TonyHunter87152April 23, 2017 03:44PM


9er8er141April 23, 2017 03:51PM

  Re: not bad

TonyHunter87135April 24, 2017 06:45AM

  I agree. Rams need a big WR, but.......

NewMexicoRam179April 23, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: I agree. Rams need a big WR, but.......

oldschoolramfan160April 23, 2017 04:34PM

  but were not trying to emulate NE

PHDram139April 24, 2017 06:59AM

  You convinced me...

JamesJM95April 24, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: You convinced me...

PHDram103April 24, 2017 09:13AM