Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

This is true and I agree.

March 22, 2017 02:11AM
The downward curve of finding a starter is steep after round 1. That's just the math; there's no denying it. Later round picks have a low probability of ever being a starter. Of course when the League has like 1700 players, many starters are late round picks, but not as compared to 1st and 2nd round.

It is useless to point to the Tom Brady's, Antonio Brown's, etc. as what can be found in later rounds. Essentially what most of those were, were bad evaluations by scouts and GMs who are paid to find the best players.

The thought of "waiting" (implication is that it is intentional) to pick a WR in the later rounds when a starter is NEEDED, and when almost for certain a potential starter quality guy will be there at the top of round 2, is faulty logic. A need is a priority. You don't put off priorities until later if you want to keep your job.

The Rams NEED a TE, WR, and Center. Then hopefully there are 2 of the 3 position players in rounds 2 and 3 who are worthy of that pick. According to the draft gurus, CB and WR are deep this year, and to an extent so is TE. But as usual, all the teams know this. That means that those who have needs in that direction are going to line up at the trough for rounds 1 and 2 for these guys, and so some other positions might slip into the early part of round 3. Who doesn't need a WR or a CB? So if anything is going to "slip" it is (as concerns the Rams) possibly the TE's and Centers.

I think the Rams are going to go for WR and TE in rounds 2 and 3, but will be open to CB if one they really like for Phillip's D, and they have high grades on, falls to them.

What is unpredictable is when there are "runs" on players. Happens almost every year. It looks like there will be plenty of position "A" to go around; but then teams that weren't expected to go for that position do, and then that position group gets hollowed out in a hurry.

Rams: be smart. Go for the WR or CB in round 2: which ever one that your board says is CLEARLY the better prospect. But if the board says that a CB and WR are pretty well grouped as equals, for Pete's sake get the WR. The most important thing this year revolves around Goff. a) give Goff more weapons, and b) give Goff better protection.

So I hope the Rams go WR -TE or TE-WR, assuming the right fit and value is there.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Looking at mock drafts: Kupp will likely be there at 37

RockRam1341March 21, 2017 12:18PM

  Re: Looking at mock drafts: Kupp will likely be there at 37

alyoshamucci394March 21, 2017 12:43PM

  But will it be the (dreaded) BPA, or will need trump it?

RockRam294March 21, 2017 02:23PM

  Re: But will it be the (dreaded) BPA, or will need trump it?

Classicalwit222March 23, 2017 03:49AM

  Re: This year may warrant an adjustment in strategy

dzrams337March 21, 2017 03:03PM

  Re: This year may warrant an adjustment in strategy

Rams43253March 21, 2017 03:10PM

  Re: This year may warrant an adjustment in strategy

dzrams350March 21, 2017 03:42PM

  This year may warrant a different strategy: Solid Post dzrams

Anonymous User267March 21, 2017 04:29PM

  Re: This year may warrant a different strategy: Solid Post dzrams

bigjimram21221March 21, 2017 07:13PM

  yep no more scrubs

ferragamo79212March 22, 2017 05:17PM

  Re: yep no more scrubs

alyoshamucci276March 22, 2017 05:27PM

  Re: yep no more scrubs

dzrams274March 22, 2017 06:35PM

  Re: yep no more scrubs

CraigMatson190March 22, 2017 07:26PM

  pro days

Deadpool246March 23, 2017 08:25AM

  define good?

Deadpool206March 23, 2017 08:38AM

  Re: define good?

dzrams238March 23, 2017 08:47AM

  dz, do you need instant production or are you willing to wait

Deadpool248March 23, 2017 08:58AM

  Re: dz, do you need instant production or are you willing to wait

dzrams243March 23, 2017 09:27AM

  i'd focus on Hanson, Kupp, Smith-Schuster and Godwin then

Deadpool199March 23, 2017 09:37AM

  This is true and I agree.

RockRam381March 22, 2017 02:11AM

  Re: Looking at mock drafts: Kupp will likely be there at 37

Rams43293March 21, 2017 12:45PM

  I wouldn't take him there

BigGame81313March 21, 2017 03:03PM

  Re: Me either BG too many better players there...NM

laram297March 21, 2017 03:14PM

  I agree but you just cannot use the weak competition

Deadpool267March 21, 2017 03:35PM

  I think a 1st round talent will be there at 37

BigGame81300March 21, 2017 04:16PM

  no doubt

Deadpool251March 21, 2017 06:20PM

  Re: no doubt

bigjimram21313March 21, 2017 07:17PM

  totally agree

LMU93269March 22, 2017 04:21AM

  Re: totally agree

CraigMatson214March 22, 2017 06:36AM

  Re: totally agree

dzrams203March 22, 2017 01:57PM

  Re: totally agree

CraigMatson193March 22, 2017 04:44PM

  He also dominated at the Senior Bowl

9er8er316March 21, 2017 04:56PM