Quote
bigjimram21
A team in Cali would have to give Close to $120,000,000 contract to match a $100,000,000 one in Florida.
A cap should be set according to each states income tax.
It is not as simple as that.
yes the current system is flawed and requires adjusting .... however ... Your system can be exploited to give a high-tax-rate team an opportunity to pay a top-tier player more money than teams in low-tax-rate states can.
1. I don't know why the writer of the article did a vaudeville dance to avoid using the term "
after tax income". This is what the issue is about, and the argument against the current system is valid.
2. Nevertheless, by merely upping the salary cap for teams in high-tax states will cause an imbalance ... high-tax state teams and low-tax state teams will still give the identical pre-tax contracts to draft picks as well as un-drafted free agents and vet minimum contracts.... low tier players on high-tax state teams get screwed over just like they are now ... resulting in most of the increased "adjusted amount" getting used for elite players .
I want this guy wearing Horns: Jordan Westercamp
the video doesn't show how good his hands really are. I think he can be the next Danny Amendola.... with Chris Carter's hands... and then some.
