I like Goff but I'm never impressed by a player or coach taking the blame. I have never heard a qb after a loss say: "Well ya know-it wasn't ALL my fault". Same with a coach. Right now I'm more interested in the story about Gurley-assuming we will ever know anything beyond the company line "he's fine-just couldn't find the right time to get him involved."by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
and hopefully I will wake up on Sunday morning and this will all have been a dream. Good night/by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
but i wish the Rams would simply confirm that so that all the speculation (i,e, he's a mental case) would go away. And of course that is what Dylan Hernandez's article in the L.A.Times said. But naturally everyone put the writer down for not knowing anything and blah blah blah. I even got criticized for -heavens sake- posting the darn article. Turns out he was absolutely right -the question noby waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
Gurley's upside if healthy is far greater than Anderson-who is a pedestrian back who had a couple of great games at the end of the season for the Rams. He wouldn't get the same respect as a healthy Gurley would.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
No you don't want him to be like Edelman. Have you noticed how Edelman has those squintty little eyes? Harvard medical school did a study on people with squintty little eyes and concluded they are bad people. I've never liked Edelman since I read that study. Bad person-those squintty little eyes.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
He's not ! (fine)by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
I don't know either James. I would most certainly hope its not "mental" as suggested in this post. My best hope is that he's injured but not significantly enough to not play him but significantly enough to remove him as a threat-if that makes any sense. Add to that the first two explosive games by Anderson and you have a witches brew. On the one hand you hope that Gurley can break someby waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
Yes something is fishy. I hope papers such as the Times here in L.A. who pay reporters to find answers do just that on this issue.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
Of course that is the question for the day. And we may never get a clear answer. But I'm sure this will be discussed withing the confines of management especially if there are no further announcements -such as surgery, etc-re his health. Personally, and I'm in the dark as much as anyone, I've thought since Detroit, that his knee-the one injured at Georgia-has been re-injured. Who knows? But youby waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
No one is laughing at the score.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
are not going to spend the type of $$ they need to get back to the WS. The Guggenheim people have let their shareholders know that they will not be spending the same kind of dough as before. They are going to need a catcher before the season begins and at least one more right handed power hitter on the roster. Sad to see Puig go-so much talent and so little brainpower. But always fun to watch. Iby waterfield - Bucky's Pub
Welcome, welcome, welcome.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
A great post. Solid analysis. Need more of that stuff.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
Ahah-the unanswerable question for fans. Because we don't know ! Players will say its on us. Coaches will say its on us. We don't know because we are not on the field or on the bench. If your players are not executing how do you coach around that ? If the coaches are not coaching well how do you play around that.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
If Gurley is healthy then McVay, Snead and Demoff need a sit down. And maybe with Kroenke present.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
I don't even know what that means? I guess I'm too old to know.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
is so Belichick would focus on Gurley and not Goff. But Billy is too smart for that BS and so knowing Gurley would not be a threat did what he had to do to stop the passing game-which he did.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
The Rams also had no running game. Add that to your list and I agree its no surprise they lost to a great defensive head coach. But they also played really tough defense and the game was in doubt until the final 5 minutes. So congratulations to the Rams for a spectacular season.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
to acknowledge-except the L.A.Times. And that is Gurley was not going to be a threat ! Belichick is famous for taking away the opposing teams biggest threat. He knew it would not be Gurley so he did everything to stop Goff-and he did. Had Gurley been 100% there is no way Goff would have been under the pressure he was the entire game. Gurley would have had the middle of the field all to himself-haby waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
Of course. And that's why Belichick can focus on the "main" threat of the Rams, namely Goff. I suspect that was the plan all along. Tight game. Up to the defense and turnovers.by waterfield - Game Time Forum
"And you did your part! " By posting an article in the L.A. Times on the Rams star player? I should be more careful.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
but that's just my "opinion".by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
What should it read: "Here's my opinion" ? All this stuff is opinion. With teams so close to the vest there are no "facts". Moreover, writers are paid for "opinions".by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com
Unfortunately she is in a time warp.by waterfield - RamsFootballFans.com