[
en.wikipedia.org]
The wiki article is fairly long and detailed and a decent read. The main take-away is how vastly different the number of infected changes with small changes to R
0.
Quote
In epidemiology, the basic reproduction number (sometimes called basic reproductive ratio, or incorrectly basic reproductive rate, and denoted R0, pronounced R nought or R zero[18]) of an infection can be thought of as the expected number of cases directly generated by one case in a population where all individuals are susceptible to infection.
In other words, if one person gets it, how many people can ultimately be infected just from that 1 person. This decreases over time because eventually we run out of people that haven't been already infected. But the math is the interesting part because with 370M people it takes a while to slow down. We don't know enough about the Wuhan Virus for an accurate R
0 so for sake of demonstration we will go with the range in the linked article (1.4 - 3.9). Notice that the 2009 flu has been well studied and sits in an narrow range of 1.4-1.6.
Reading the graph at R
0 = 2. The first person infects 2 people and they infect 2 people, etc. After 10 iterations the result is 1024 infected.
Change R
0 to 3 and the first person infects 3 people and they all infect 3 people, etc. and count after 10 iterations is now almost 60,000.
Social distancing, event cancellations, and the possible upcoming guidance on masks all have different effects on R
0. But as we can see, even small changes have big impacts over time.