You post thought/opinions/observations from people posting to other boards. I actually have no problem with this.
But in this particular thread, you posted observations from "Tano" that APPEAR to have been disproven by 53 - not necessarily with his (53's) own subjective thoughts or observations, but with what APPEARS to be tangible visual evidence.
Question: Have you posted (or considered posting) a link to 53's comments about Tano's observations to the other board seeking comment from him or others? You know...kinda like you do here?
If you haven't, it's cool and I can understand. Although we're used to 53 over here, I could understand how his "passion" for tangible-based discussion might be...(ahem!) a little disconcerting for those not used to him.
But you can understand where my question is coming from, though, right?
When presented with what appears to be tangible evidence that might counter his personal observations, what do you suppose Tano might say?
Oh...OK. It actually looks like the defense has been employing the same similar concepts from previous games. I thought it was different, but it looks to be the same.or
JimYoungblood53? Who the ____ is JimYoungblood53? I know what I saw and these phony-azzed stills from last week or the week before that don't show me nothin'. What I saw last night was much tighter coverage than the previous games...PERIOD!or
sounds of cricketsEdited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/09/2022 02:36PM by ramBRO.