Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I look at it this way

April 23, 2022 12:09PM
Quote
LMU93
Whether this year not picking until #104 or in years when they have higher picks. I think they should go BPA among their top 5 need areas. Or conversely, simply eliminate a handful of positions that they will NOT draft at 104.

In my opinion, I would scratch QB, RB, WR and ILB off. And of course K/P. Simply do not consider those positions with their top selection.

Everything else is fair game (go BPA) with that pick. My hope being it ends up as an Edge rusher, CB or OL.

I suspect that there is very little daylight between player evals by pick 104, especially in this draft.

So picking a player from an area needing depth will be easy for Snead.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  NFL Draft: Why Rams should be drafting BPA instead of Need at 104…

Rams43298April 23, 2022 06:35AM

  The BPA thing has been debunked so many times that it's boring

RockRam173April 23, 2022 06:47AM

  It's easy to over-analyze this

merlin153April 23, 2022 07:29AM

  Agree

JimYoungblood53106April 23, 2022 07:59AM

  I think it assumes that each team has a board

JimYoungblood53151April 23, 2022 07:58AM

  I look at it this way

LMU93141April 23, 2022 12:03PM

  Re: I look at it this way

Rams43139April 23, 2022 12:09PM

  Re: I look at it this way

Thirtymac, The Intrepid Ram110April 23, 2022 12:12PM

  Re: I look at it this way

Ramstien105April 23, 2022 02:43PM

  Re: Great thread

leafnose208April 24, 2022 08:03AM